atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

Uncovering the Spectral Bias in Diagonal State Space Models

NeurIPS 2025 · Architectures and efficiency › RNNs and normalization · approach: Sparse dictionary representations · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Analyzes diagonal SSM initialization from a frequency perspective and proposes S4D-DFouT, which places poles uniformly on the discrete unit circle, achieving strong LRA results and training from scratch on PathX-256.

Problem

Diagonal state space model (SSM) initializations (S4D-Lin, S4D-Inv) are defined in continuous time and discretized with a step Delta, which entangles decay and frequency and makes performance sensitive to Delta; the role of diagonal initializations is theoretically unexplained.

Approach

Initialize diagonal SSM poles directly in the discrete domain on uniformly spaced angles (DFT frequencies) with a shared learnable damping xi, synchronized with phase offsets across the SSMs of a layer, so frequency coverage is alias-free and independent of Delta.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use S4D-DFouT instead of S4 + Self-PretrainS4 state-space model · LRA PathX-256accuracy: 87.11 -> 87.89Helped
use S4D-DFouT instead of S4D-Lindiagonal SSM · Speech Commands 8kHzaccuracy: 91.58 (0.33) -> 93.85 (0.27)Helped
use S4D-DFouT instead of S4D-Lindiagonal SSM · Speech Commands 16kHzaccuracy: 96.25 (0.03) -> 96.07 (0.19)Hurt
replace uniform DFouT frequencies with token-period frequencies (ablation)S4D-DFouT · Speech Commands 8kHzaccuracy: 93.85 (0.27) -> 92.92 (0.22)Hurt
replace uniform DFouT frequencies with random frequencies (ablation)S4D-DFouT · psCIFARaccuracy: 65.72 -> 60.55Hurt
replace uniform DFouT frequencies with random frequencies (ablation)S4D-DFouT · Speech Commands 16kHzaccuracy: 96.07 (0.19) -> 95.43 (0.26)Hurt
use contiguous-batch pole synchronization instead of DFouT synchronization (ablation)S4D-DFouT · Speech Commands 8kHzaccuracy: 93.85 (0.27) -> 0.07 (0.14)Hurt
use contiguous-batch pole synchronization instead of DFouT synchronization (ablation)S4D-DFouT · psCIFARaccuracy: 65.72 -> 63.61Hurt
increase the upper bound on the decay parameter (ablation)S4D-DFouT and baseline diagonal SSMs · LRA Image and PathfinderaccuracyMixed
reduce kernel length to 32 coefficients (ablation)S4D-Lin on sCIFAR · sCIFARaccuracyNo clear effect
replace subsequent SSM layers with identity mappings, keeping only the first k layers active (ablation)S4D-Lin on sCIFAR · sCIFARaccuracyHurt
use S4D-DFouT instead of S4D-Invdiagonal SSM · sCIFARaccuracy: 90.69 (0.06) -> 89.87 (0.07)Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: LRA sCIFAR psCIFAR Speech Commands BIDMC continuous copying (synthetic)

Benchmarks: Long Range Arena sCIFAR psCIFAR Speech Commands BIDMC

Metrics: accuracy RMSE reconstruction MSE

Baselines: S4-LegS S4-FouT S5 S4D-Lin S4D-Inv S4D-LegS S4 + Self-Pretrain LRU Liquid-S4 MEGA

Builds on: S4 S4D HiPPO DSS S5

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy