atlas

Research map / Large language models / Language, safety and interpretability

Zero-Shot Detection of LLM-Generated Text via Implicit Reward Model

NeurIPS 2025 · Large language models › Language, safety and interpretability · approach: Zero-shot machine-text detection · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes IRM, a zero-shot LLM-generated text detector that scores texts by the implicit reward log(pi_instruct/pi_base) from publicly available instruction-tuned and base model pairs, requiring no training.

Problem

Zero-shot detection of LLM-generated text suffers when the source LLM is unknown and proxy models are used; existing reward-based detectors (ReMoDetect) need preference data and task-specific fine-tuning and generalize poorly to unseen LLMs.

Approach

Use the implicit reward from DPO's closed-form relation, log(pi_instruct(y)/pi_base(y)) computed from a public instruction-tuned/base model pair, as a training-free detection score, avoiding preference collection and fine-tuning.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use implicit reward scores from the Llama-3.2-1B family instead of BinocularsLLM-generated text detection · DetectRLaverage score: 87.67% to 91.77%Helped
Use implicit reward scores from the Gemma-2-2B family instead of BinocularsLLM-generated text detection · DetectRLaverage score: 77.81% to 77.05%Hurt
Use the Llama-3.2-1B family instead of the Gemma-2-2B family (ablation)IRM · DetectRLaverage score: 77.05% to 91.77%Helped
Use Qwen2 instead of Qwen2.5 at 0.5B (ablation)IRM · DetectRLaverage score: 73.24% to 82.79%Helped
Use the 0.5B rather than 1.5B Qwen2.5 model (ablation)IRM · DetectRLaverage score: 69.69% to 73.24%Helped
Use Gemma-2B rather than Gemma-2-2B (ablation)IRM · DetectRLaverage score: 77.05% to 83.72%Helped
Scale Llama from 1B to 3B (ablation)IRM · DetectRLaverage score: 91.77% to 91.08%Hurt
Use the instruction-tuned model instead of the base model for Log-Likelihood (ablation)Log-Likelihood · DetectRLaverage score: 66.44% to 77.46%Helped
Use the instruction-tuned model instead of the base model for Fast-DetectGPT (ablation)Fast-DetectGPT · DetectRLaverage score: +3.98Hurt
Use the Llama-3.2-1B-family IRM rather than ReMoDetectLLM-generated text detection · DetectRLaverage score: 85.86% to 91.77%Helped
Use Llama-3.2-1B-family IRM rather than BinocularsLLM-generated text detection · DivScoreF1: 93.96 to 96.61Helped
Use Llama-3.2-1B-family IRM rather than ReMoDetectLLM-generated text detection · DivScoreAUROC: 98.47 to 98.42Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: DetectRL RAID DivScore

Benchmarks: DetectRL RAID DivScore

Metrics: AUROC F1

Baselines: Log-Likelihood Rank Log-Rank LRR Fast-DetectGPT Lastde Binoculars ReMoDetect RM-Deberta-v3-large-v2 GRM-gemma2-2B GRM-Llama3.2-3B Skywork-Reward-V2

Builds on: DPO ReMoDetect Binoculars Fast-DetectGPT DetectRL

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy