atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Matrix and tensor methods

Low-Rank Graphon Learning for Networks

NeurIPS 2025 · Learning theory and algorithms › Matrix and tensor methods · approach: Structured low-rank learning · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a low-rank additive graphon model estimated via subgraph counts (paths and cycles) and a moment system, with sorting-and-interpolation to recover the graphon and a rank-r connection probability matrix, with sup-norm consistency.

Problem

Estimating both the low-rank connection probability matrix and the graphon function from a single observed network, where existing methods estimate only P or are computationally expensive and lack sup-norm guarantees.

Approach

Assume a truncated eigen-decomposition graphon f(u,v)=sum_k lambda_k G_k(u)G_k(v); estimate lambda_k and G_k(U_i) from moment equations built from counts of paths and cycles (with a fast matrix-power variant), then recover the graphon by sorting nodes by the reference G_1 and piecewise-linear interpolation.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use the proposed estimator instead of the strongest listed baseline for MSELow-rank graphon estimation · Dense graphons 1–7MSE: 1.275 vs 1.282; 2.452 vs 2.400; 1.973 vs 1.919; 1.826 vs 1.890; 1.774 vs 1.769; 2.582 vs 2.380; 3.768 vs 3.640Mixed
Use the proposed estimator instead of the strongest listed baseline for MSELow-rank graphon estimation · Sparse graphons 1–7 (ρₙ = 1/√n)MSE: 0.036 vs 0.051; 0.115 vs 0.132; 0.075 vs 0.099; 0.043 vs 0.111; 0.071 vs 0.118; 0.105 vs 0.224; 0.091 vs 0.259Helped
Add the standardization step for estimated components (ablation)Rank-r estimator · Dense and sparse graphonsestimation performanceHelped
Replace repeated-node path and cycle counts with corrected counts (ablation)Fast rank-r estimator · Rank-r graphonsfinite-sample estimation accuracyHelped
Overestimate rank-1 graphons as rank 2 (ablation)Proposed estimator · Rank-1 graphons 1–3MSE (×10⁻⁴): ID 1: 1.45; ID 2: 6.11; ID 3: 1.92No clear effect
Underestimate rank-2 graphons as rank 1 (ablation)Proposed estimator · Rank-2 graphons 4–6MSE (× 10⁻⁴): 15.559; 1.810; 71.987Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Primary School contact data (SocioPatterns) U.S. Political Blogs

Benchmarks: simulated graphons 1-7 (dense and sparse) Primary School contact data U.S. Political Blogs

Metrics: MSE of P maximum entrywise error sup-norm graphon error run time triangle and transitivity error

Baselines: USVT Sort-and-Smooth (SAS) Network Histogram (Nethist) Neighborhood Smoothing (N.S.) Power Iteration (P.I.)

Builds on: USVT Sort-and-Smooth neighborhood smoothing network histogram

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy