atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Molecules and proteins

Symbolic Cognitive Diagnosis via Hybrid Optimization for Intelligent Education Systems

AAAI 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Molecules and proteins · approach: Counterfactual and statistical explanations · 13 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a symbolic cognitive diagnosis (SCD) framework that alternates genetic-programming symbolic regression of a monotonic interaction function with Adam optimization of student and exercise parameters, improving interpretability while keeping generalization competitive on four education datasets.

Problem

Cognitive diagnosis models face a trade-off between generalization (predicting student responses) and interpretability (interaction function and proficiency levels); existing models either lack interpretable non-linear interaction functions or are black-box neural networks.

Approach

Represent the student-exercise interaction function as a symbolic tree learned by genetic programming with a monotonic operator set, and alternate this with gradient-based Adam optimization of proficiency and exercise parameters in a hybrid discrete-continuous loop.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add GP to learn and update the interaction function (ablation)SCDM · Math1accuracy: 67.22 -> 67.78Helped
add Adam instead of using an evolutionary strategy for parameter optimization (ablation)SCDM · Math1accuracy: 67.30 -> 67.78Helped
add GP to learn and update the interaction function (ablation)SCDM · Math2accuracy: 69.05 -> 69.79Helped
add Adam instead of using an evolutionary strategy for parameter optimization (ablation)SCDM · Math2accuracy: 68.43 -> 69.79Helped
add GP to learn and update the interaction function (ablation)SCDM · FracSubaccuracy: 82.67 -> 83.26Helped
add Adam instead of using an evolutionary strategy for parameter optimization (ablation)SCDM · FracSubaccuracy: 76.42 -> 83.26Helped
add GP to learn and update the interaction function (ablation)SCDM · NeurIPS2020accuracy: 63.43 -> 67.25Helped
add Adam instead of using an evolutionary strategy for parameter optimization (ablation)SCDM · NeurIPS2020accuracy: 63.27 -> 67.25Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Math1 Math2 FracSub NeurIPS2020

Benchmarks: Math1 Math2 FracSub NeurIPS2020

Metrics: accuracy AUC F1 DOA

Baselines: IRT MIRT DINA NCDM KaNCD SCDM w.o. GP SCDM w.o. Adam

Builds on: item response theory multidimensional IRT DINA NCDM KaNCD

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy