atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / Open-set and few-shot detection

Learning Segmentation from Point Trajectories

NeurIPS 2024 · Detection and segmentation › Open-set and few-shot detection · approach: Unsupervised object and part discovery · 4 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Trains an image segmentation network without labels using a low-rank trajectory loss on long-term point tracks, combined with an optical-flow parametric loss and temporal smoothing.

Problem

Unsupervised segmentation of independently moving objects in video using motion as the only supervision, where long-term motion from point trajectories is hard to model parametrically.

Approach

Inspired by subspace clustering, a loss penalizes singular values beyond rank r of masked trajectory matrices, so that trajectories of the same object are approximately linear combinations of each other; this is combined with a flow-based quadratic motion-fit loss and trained end-to-end over a video dataset.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use LRTL trajectory grouping instead of trajectory clustering baselinesMotion segmentation on MOVi-F · MOVi-FARI: 15.26 -> 46.07Helped
Use LRTL trajectory grouping instead of trajectory clustering baselinesMotion segmentation on MOVi-F · MOVi-FFG-ARI: 42.53 -> 65.76Helped
Train with LRTL rather than the strongest listed prior methodUnsupervised video segmentation · DAVISJ: 80.9 -> 82.2Helped
Train with LRTL rather than the strongest listed prior methodUnsupervised video segmentation · SegTrackv2J: 79.9 -> 81.2Helped
Train with LRTL rather than the strongest listed prior methodUnsupervised video segmentation · FBMSJ: 78.4 -> 79.6Helped
Add trajectory loss to flow loss (ablation)LRTL · DAVISJ: 78.5 -> 81.7Helped
Add temporal smoothing loss to flow and trajectory losses (ablation)LRTL · DAVISJ: 81.7 -> 82.2Helped
Use trajectory loss alone instead of flow loss alone (ablation)LRTL · DAVISJ: 78.5 -> 71.9Hurt
Replace singular-value trajectory loss with reconstruction, perspective, or tracks-as-flow losses (ablation)LRTL · DAVISJ: 71.9 -> 11.1; 18.2; 14.6; 65.3Hurt
Set rank r below 5 (ablation)LRTL · DAVISJ: 82.2 -> 76.0; 79.6Hurt
Set rank r above 5 (ablation)LRTL · DAVISJ: 82.2 -> 80.9Hurt
Vary predicted component count from k=4 (ablation)LRTL · DAVISJ: 82.2 -> 78.0; 82.0; 72.8Mixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MOVi-F (Kubric) DAVIS 2016 SegTrackv2 FBMS

Benchmarks: MOVi-F DAVIS 2016 SegTrackv2 FBMS

Metrics: ARI FG-ARI Jaccard (J)

Baselines: K-Means SSC LRR OCLR DivA Meunier et al. GWM RCF LOCATE VideoCutLER VideoSAUR

Builds on: RAFT CoTracker MaskFormer RCF

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy