atlas

Research map / Bandits and online learning / Contextual bandits and Thompson sampling

Sequential Probability Assignment with Contexts: Minimax Regret, Contextual Shtarkov Sums, and Contextual Normalized Maximum Likelihood

NeurIPS 2024 · Bandits and online learning › Contextual bandits and Thompson sampling · approach: Causal and structured bandits · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Characterizes the minimax regret of sequential probability assignment with contexts (log loss, arbitrary hypothesis classes, multiary labels) via a worst-case contextual Shtarkov sum, derives the minimax-optimal cNML strategy, and gives a short proof of a sequential-entropy regret bound.

Problem

Minimax regret for online learning with logarithmic loss over arbitrary (possibly nonparametric) contextual hypothesis classes; sequential l_infinity entropy was shown not to characterize it.

Approach

Introduces the contextual Shtarkov sum (Shtarkov sum over a context tree) and shows the worst-case log of it equals minimax regret, with no regularity assumptions; the minimax optimal strategy cNML is the NML distribution using contextual Shtarkov sums with prefix.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use the worst-case contextual Shtarkov sum to characterize regretSequential probability assignment with contexts · Sequential probability assignment with contextsminimax regret characterizationHelped
use contextual Normalized Maximum Likelihood (cNML)Sequential probability assignment with contexts · Sequential probability assignment with contextsminimax regretHelped
use sequential \ell_{\infty} entropy in the new regret boundSequential probability assignment with contexts · Binary labels, non-sequential expertsregret upper boundHelped
use the sequential entropy upper bound instead of the cited state-of-the-art boundsSequential probability assignment with contexts · Binary labels, non-sequential expertsregret upper boundHelped
use sequential \ell_{\infty} covering number bounds for both classesSequential covering-number regret analysis · Linear class versus absolute linear classminimax regret rate characterization: \tilde O(\sqrt{T}) versus \tilde\Theta(T^{2/3})Mixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: minimax regret log contextual Shtarkov sum

Baselines: sequential l_infinity covering bound (Bilodeau et al., 2020) global sequential covering bound (Wu et al., 2023)

Builds on: Shtarkov sum / NML (Shtarkov 1987) Rakhlin, Sridharan, Tewari 2010 sequential Rademacher complexity Bilodeau et al. 2020 sequential entropy bound Wu et al. 2023 global sequential covering bound

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy