atlas

Research map / Image generation / Fast diffusion sampling

Phased Consistency Models

NeurIPS 2024 · Image generation › Fast diffusion sampling · approach: Distillation for few-step generation · 11 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Phased Consistency Models (PCMs), which split the PF-ODE trajectory into sub-trajectories with per-phase self-consistency, optional CFG-free consistency distillation, and a latent adversarial loss, to improve latent consistency models for text-to-image and text-to-video generation.

Problem

Latent consistency models for high-resolution text-conditioned image generation have inconsistent multi-step sampling, poor controllability (limited CFG range, insensitivity to negative prompts), and low quality in few-step settings.

Approach

Partition the PF-ODE trajectory into several sub-trajectories, enforce self-consistency only within each, use an exact-solution epsilon-based parameterization (DDIM-like form without c_skip/c_out), allowing CFG-free teacher ODE solving, and add a latent-space GAN-style adversarial consistency loss.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use phased consistency models instead of LCMStable Diffusion v1-5 · COCO-30K, 1 stepFID-SD: 53.43 -> 8.27Helped
Use phased consistency models instead of LCMStable Diffusion v1-5 · CC12M-30K, 1 stepFID-SD: 42.67 -> 7.91Helped
Use PCM instead of SDXL-LightningStable Diffusion XL · COCO-30K, 1 stepFID-SD: 9.11 -> 9.32Hurt
Use PCM instead of SDXL-TurboStable Diffusion XL · CC12M-30K, 2 stepsFID-SD: 6.53 -> 7.02Hurt
Use PCM instead of SDXL-LightningStable Diffusion XL · CC12M-30K, 8 stepsFID-SD: 5.83 -> 5.19Helped
Use PCM instead of AnimateLCMAnimateLCM design · UCF-101 captions, 1 stepCLIP Score: 25.41 -> 29.88Helped
Add adversarial consistency loss (ablation)PCM · Stable Diffusion XL, 1 stepHPS: 0.251 -> 0.280Helped
Add adversarial consistency loss (ablation)PCM · Stable Diffusion XL, 1 stepAES: 4.994 -> 5.620Helped
Add adversarial consistency loss (ablation)PCM · Stable Diffusion XL, 1 stepPickScore: 0.206 -> 0.225Helped
Add adversarial consistency loss (ablation)PCM · Stable Diffusion XL, 2–16 stepsHPS: 0.275 -> 0.282; 0.281 -> 0.284; 0.283 -> 0.285; 0.283 -> 0.284Helped
Replace the latent discriminator with a DINO pixel discriminator (ablation)PCM adversarial consistency design · Image generationvisual detailHurt
Replace the proposed adversarial loss with normal GAN loss (ablation)PCM adversarial consistency design · Image generationtraining stabilityHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CC3M WebVid-2M

Benchmarks: COCO-2014 30K CC12M-30K UCF-101 captions

Metrics: FID FID-CLIP FID-SD CLIP score CLIP consistency flow magnitude HPSv2 PickScore LAION aesthetic score

Baselines: InstaFlow SD-Turbo LCM CTM TCD SDXL-Turbo SDXL-Lightning SDXL-LCM SDXL-CTM AnimateLCM DDIM DPM

Builds on: consistency models latent consistency models consistency trajectory models AnimateLCM DDIM

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy