atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Cross-modal learning

QUEST: Quadruple Multimodal Contrastive Learning with Constraints and Self-Penalization

NeurIPS 2024 · Vision-language and multimodal › Cross-modal learning · approach: Multimodal fusion with missing modalities · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes QUEST, a quadruple contrastive framework that splits encoder outputs into shared and unique decoders, aligns them via quaternion cross-product spaces with orthogonal constraints, and applies shared-information-guided self-penalization to reweight hard negatives.

Problem

Standard multimodal contrastive learning treats all negatives equally and, in multi-view settings, prioritizes shared information while suppressing modality-specific unique information (feature suppression and shortcut learning).

Approach

Separate shared and unique decoders on a shared encoder; build a quaternion-style embedding via cross products of shared and unique vectors, contrast these normal vectors across modalities, add an orthogonalized cosine loss, and penalize hard negatives using a similarity-based weight matrix derived from shared representations.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
quaternion contrastive objectives with self-penalization (QUEST) vs vanilla InfoNCECLIP · Flickr30kRSUM: +3.2 (text: 543.5 to 546.7)Helped
QUEST vs vanilla InfoNCECLIP · MS-COCORSUM: +8.1 (text)Helped
QUEST vs vanilla InfoNCEVSE++ · Flickr30kRSUM: +12.1 (text)Helped
QUEST vs vanilla InfoNCEVSE++ · MS-COCORSUM: +17.3 (text)Helped
QUEST vs vanilla InfoNCE on shortcut dataCLIP · Flickr30k with synthetic shortcutsRSUM: 527.8 vs 436.2 (text notes average gain 97.95%)Helped
unique-information constraint alone (no shared constraint) (ablation)CLIP · Flickr30kRSUM: 519.9 vs 546.7 full QUESTHurt
self-penalization (LP-UIC instead of LUIC) (ablation)CLIP with LSIC · Flickr30kRSUM: 529.8 to 546.7 (with LSIC, LP-UIC vs LUIC)Helped
dual shared decoders instead of shared+unique decoder (ablation)VSE++ · Flickr30kRSUM: Table 2 shows decline vs single shared decoderHurt
QUEST on image-audio and text-audio retrieval (added audio modality)InfoNCE baseline · FMA / GTZAN / CLOTHO / AUDIOCAPSRSUM: e.g. GTZAN i2a 213.15 to 228.1Helped
QUEST vs LTD/IFM on Flickr30k with CLIP (no shortcut)CLIP · Flickr30kRSUM: 546.7 vs 544.9 (IFM)Helped
QUEST on VSE++ Flickr30k vs LTDVSE++ · Flickr30kRSUM: 421.6 vs LTD 419.6 (shortcut-free comparison) but LTD better in some casesMixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Flickr30k MS-COCO FMA GTZAN CLOTHO AUDIOCAPS synthetic shortcut MNIST-augmented Flickr30k/MS-COCO

Benchmarks: Flickr30k MS-COCO FMA GTZAN CLOTHO AUDIOCAPS

Metrics: Recall@1 Recall@5 Recall@10 RSUM

Baselines: InfoNCE LTD IFM VSE++

Builds on: InfoNCE FactorCL latent target decoding implicit feature modification SimCLR

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy