atlas

Research map / Bandits and online learning / Contextual bandits and Thompson sampling

Improved Bayes Regret Bounds for Multi-Task Hierarchical Bayesian Bandit Algorithms

NeurIPS 2024 · Bandits and online learning › Contextual bandits and Thompson sampling · approach: Thompson sampling analysis · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Gives improved Bayes regret bounds for hierarchical Thompson sampling (HierTS) in multi-task linear and semi-bandits, and proposes HierBayesUCB with logarithmic gap-dependent bounds, covering sequential and concurrent settings.

Problem

Bayes regret of hierarchical Bayesian bandit algorithms in multi-task Gaussian linear bandits and combinatorial semi-bandits, where task parameters are drawn from a shared hyper-prior; prior bounds were loose by log factors.

Approach

Tighter posterior-variance analysis (a Cauchy-Schwarz-type inequality, a matrix bound reducing the condition-number factor from kappa^2 to kappa) improves HierTS's bound; a new hierarchical BayesUCB algorithm with UCB-based action selection yields logarithmic gap-dependent bounds, extended to concurrent and combinatorial semi-bandit settings.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Improve the regret analysis of HierTSHierTS · Multi-task Gaussian linear bandit, infinite action set, sequentialBayes regret upper bound: O(m√(n log n log (mn))) -> O(m√n log n)Helped
Use HierBayesUCB instead of HierTSMulti-task Gaussian linear bandit · Finite action set, sequentialBayes regret upper bound: O(md√(n log (n/d))) -> O(md log (n/d) log (mn))Helped
Improve the concurrent regret analysis of HierTSHierTS · Multi-task Gaussian linear bandit, infinite action set, concurrentBayes regret upper bound: O(md√(n log (n/d) log (mn))) -> O(md√(n log (n/d)))Helped
Extend HierBayesUCB to combinatorial semi-banditsCombinatorial HierBayesUCB · Multi-task Gaussian combinatorial semi-bandit, sequentialBayes regret upper bound: O(m√n log n) -> O(m log n log (mn))Helped
Increase the number of tasks m (ablation)HierTS · Synthetic linear banditregretHurt
Increase the number of rounds n (ablation)HierTS · Synthetic linear banditregretHurt
Increase the action-space dimension d (ablation)HierTS · Synthetic linear banditregretHurt
Increase the number of concurrent tasks L (ablation)HierTS · Synthetic linear banditregretNo clear effect
Reduce the hyper-prior variance σq (ablation)HierTS · Synthetic linear banditregretHelped
Reduce the task variance σ0 (ablation)HierTS · Synthetic linear banditregretHelped
Reduce the reward-noise variance σ (ablation)HierTS · Synthetic linear banditregretHelped
Use HierBayesUCB instead of HierTSHierarchical Bayesian bandit algorithms · Synthetic linear banditregretHelped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: synthetic Gaussian linear bandit instances

Benchmarks: synthetic Gaussian linear bandit experiments

Metrics: cumulative Bayes regret

Baselines: HierTS (Hong et al. 2022) vanilla TS OracleTS Kveton et al. 2021 combinatorial hierarchical TS

Builds on: HierTS (Hong et al. 2022) Bayes regret analysis of Thompson sampling (Russo and Van Roy; Min et al. 2021 C BayesUCB (Kaufmann et al. 2012) Hierarchical Bayesian bandit (Penicheiro/Kveton et al. 2021)

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy