atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Cross-modal learning

Identifiable Shared Component Analysis of Unpaired Multimodal Mixtures

NeurIPS 2024 · Vision-language and multimodal › Cross-modal learning · approach: Multimodal fusion with missing modalities · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a distribution-matching loss (adversarial, with orthonormality constraints) to identify shared components from unaligned multimodal linear mixtures, with milder conditions than ICA-based prior work and structural constraints (shared mixing, weak supervision) for further relaxation.

Problem

Identifying shared latent components across two modalities generated as linear mixtures of shared and private components when cross-modality samples are unpaired (unaligned).

Approach

Match distributions of linearly embedded multimodal data (adversarial distribution matching with whitening constraints) instead of paired CCA; identifiability follows from a geometric "modality variability" assumption plus either non-Gaussian independent content or hyper-rectangular content support, with structural constraints (shared mixing matrix, few paired samples) relaxing requirements furthe

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
post-process CLIP features with the proposed shared component methodCLIP ViT-L/14 · Office-31 averageclassification accuracy: 91.2 -> 93.0Helped
post-process CLIP features with the proposed shared component methodCLIP ViT-L/14 · Office-Home averageclassification accuracy: 85.0 -> 87.2Helped
use the proposed method without paired-sample supervision instead of CM-AERNA–ATAC shared representation · A549 RNA–ATAC test setk-NN accuracy: around 3 times greaterHelped
add one paired sample of supervision (ablation)Proposed RNA–ATAC shared representation · A549 RNA–ATAC test setk-NN accuracy: around 5 times higherHelped
increase the number of available paired samples (ablation)Proposed RNA–ATAC shared representation · A549 RNA–ATAC test setk-NN accuracyHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Office-31 Office-Home A549 single-cell RNA/ATAC data

Benchmarks: Office-31 Office-Home A549 RNA-ATAC k-NN

Metrics: classification accuracy k-NN accuracy

Baselines: DANN ADDA DAN JAN CDAN MDD MCC CLIP CM-AE

Builds on: canonical correlation analysis independent component analysis GAN adversarial loss CLIP

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy