atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

An exactly solvable model for emergence and scaling laws in the multitask sparse parity problem

NeurIPS 2024 · Architectures and efficiency › RNNs and normalization · approach: Neural scaling laws · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes an analytically solvable multilinear model in a skill (orthogonal basis function) representation of multitask sparse parity, deriving scaling laws and calibrating one parameter to predict emergence in 2-layer MLPs and a transformer.

Problem

Understanding emergence of new skills and the origin of neural scaling laws; existing LLM emergence studies are expensive and lack analytic models linking neural dynamics to scaling.

Approach

Represent each skill as an orthogonal basis function on the multitask sparse parity problem with power-law skill frequencies, and model the network as a multilinear expansion a_k b_k g_k; this decouples per-skill dynamics (sigmoidal, Saxe-style) so time, data, and parameter scaling laws and emergence times can be derived analytically, with one calibration constant B.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Calibrate the extended multilinear model on the first skill using $\mathcal{B}^2=1/22$Multilinear model · Multitask sparse parity, time emergence across 5 skillsskill emergenceHelped
Use a $D_c$-shot extension with $D_c=800$Extended multilinear model · Multitask sparse parity, data emergence across 5 skillsskill emergenceHelped
Use an extended model with $N_c=4$ basis functions per skillExtended multilinear model · Multitask sparse parity, parameter emergence across 5 skillsskill emergenceHelped
Use the multilinear model's single-sigmoid dynamics instead of the neural network's multiple-sigmoid dynamicsMultilinear model compared with 2-layer MLP · Multitask sparse parity, time emergencetime to full saturationHurt
Use the extended model's decoupled skill dynamics when $d_k \ll D_c$Extended multilinear model compared with 2-layer MLP · Multitask sparse parity, data emergenceabruptness of skill emergenceHurt
Use the multilinear model's strict preference for frequent skillsMultilinear model compared with 2-layer MLP · Multitask sparse parity, parameter emergenceconsistency of learning less frequent skillsMixed
Use a transformer architecture for time emergenceTransformer · Multitask sparse parity, $\alpha=0.9$emergent time scaling with skill index: $\tau_{emerge}(k) \propto k^{\alpha+1}$Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: multitask sparse parity (synthetic)

Benchmarks: multitask sparse parity

Metrics: MSE loss skill strength R_k/S emergence time

Baselines: 2-layer MLP trained on multitask sparse parity linear model with same basis functions

Builds on: Michaud et al. quanta model / multitask sparse parity Saxe et al. two-layer linear network dynamics Hutter feature-based data scaling

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy