atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Kernels and regression theory

A two-scale Complexity Measure for Deep Learning Models

NeurIPS 2024 · Learning theory and algorithms › Kernels and regression theory · approach: Generalization theory of deep networks · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces the two-scale effective dimension (2sED), a Fisher-geometry complexity measure that bounds generalization error, and a layerwise-computable lower bound (lower 2sED) for Markovian/feedforward models, validated on small MLPs and CNNs.

Problem

Existing complexity measures for deep models are either data-independent and loose, or require global Fisher spectrum computation that is infeasible for large models; a pre-training, scalable, modular complexity measure is needed for model selection.

Approach

Defines the two-scale effective dimension via a micro-scale covering radius and a meso-scale partition controlled by an exponent zeta, using Fisher balls and normalized Fisher information; for Markovian models a Jensen-based layerwise iterative lower bound makes it computable block by block.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use lower 2sED instead of 2sEDMarkovian neural networks · Covertype and MNISTapproximation tightnessHelped
Vary the stochastic block variance σ²Feed-forward neural networks · Covertype and MNIST2sED and lower 2sEDNo clear effect
Increase the number of samples and parameterizations used for Monte Carlo estimationLower 2sED · Covertype, MNIST, and CIFAR10estimate stabilityNo clear effect
Use MLP 54-16-7 rather than the other tested MLPsMLPs trained on Covertype · Covertype, 10000 training samplestraining lossHelped
Use MLP 54-13-11-9-7 rather than the other tested MLPsMLPs trained on Covertype · Covertype, 100000 training samplestraining lossHelped
Vary the covering radius εMLP 54-16-7 and MLP 54-13-11-9-7 · Covertyperelative lower 2sED / expressivenessMixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Covertype MNIST CIFAR10

Benchmarks: Covertype MNIST CIFAR10

Metrics: lower 2sED training loss

Baselines: effective dimension (zeta=0)

Builds on: effective dimension (Abbas et al.) box-counting dimension K-FAC

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy