atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Recognition and long-tail

The iNaturalist Sounds Dataset

NeurIPS 2024 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Recognition and long-tail · approach: Dense features and foundation priors · 8 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces iNatSounds, a ~230K-recording, 5,500-species weakly labeled bioacoustic dataset from iNaturalist, benchmarks CNN/ViT backbones with multiclass vs multilabel (assume-negative plus mean-teacher) objectives, and evaluates transfer to strongly labeled bird and frog datasets.

Problem

Large-scale, fine-grained, easily accessible species sound datasets are lacking; existing audio datasets are coarse, licensing-restricted, or small in species coverage, and weakly labeled bioacoustic data needs suitable training objectives.

Approach

Build a large, freely licensed, species-labeled animal sound dataset from iNaturalist with a year-based train/val/test split, treat spectrograms as images for standard vision backbones, and compare multiclass against multilabel single-positive learning (assume-negative loss with mean-teacher pseudo-labeling), showing multilabel transfers better to strongly labeled downstream data.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
apply the SINR geo-prior to multiclass predictionsiNatSounds multiclass models · iNatSounds testTop-1 accuracy: 49.1$$0.17 -> 56.9 $$ 0.19; 52.6 $$ 0.95 -> 60.7 $$ 0.62; 53.6 $$ 0.22 -> 60.3 $$ 0.27Helped
use an assume-negative multilabel objective instead of multiclass trainingiNatSounds models · iNatSounds testTop-1 accuracy: 49.1$^{0.2}$ -> 42.4$^{0.4}$; 52.6$^{1.0}$ -> 48.1$^{0.4}$; 53.6$^{0.2}$ -> 52.4$^{0.1}$Hurt
use an assume-negative multilabel objective instead of multiclass trainingiNatSounds models · Powdermill and SWAMPmAP: 24.1$^{0.3}$ -> 39.7$^{1.2}$; 25.0$^{2.4}$ -> 31.6$^{1.2}$; 24.6$^{1.3}$ -> 40.2$^{0.9}$; 24.3$^{2.2}$ -> 39.0$^{0.9}$Helped
add mean-teacher training to multilabel trainingMobileNet-V3 and ResNet-50 · SSW60Top-1 accuracy: 61.4$^{1.3}$ -> 68.4$^{1.2}$; 63.8$^{1.4}$ -> 70.4$^{0.9}$Helped
add mean-teacher training to multilabel trainingViT · PowdermillmAP: 40.2$^{0.9}$ -> 37.8$^{0.5}$Hurt
add mixup augmentation (ablation)multiclass models · iNatSounds testmAP: 51.6$^{0.2}$ -> 60.0$^{0.3}$; 55.5$^{0.4}$ -> 62.8$^{0.7}$; 56.1$^{1.5}$ -> 64.4$^{0.3}$Helped
add mixup augmentation (ablation)multiclass models · PowdermillmAP: 22.3$^{0.8}$ -> 33.5$^{1.1}$; 24.1$^{0.3}$ -> 36.5$^{1.0}$; 24.6$^{1.3}$ -> 31.7$^{0.2}$Helped
pretrain on iNatSounds rather than ImageNetMobileNet-V3 on BirdCLEF 2024 · BirdCLEF 2024Class-average Top1: 09.08 -> 12.18Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: iNatSounds SSW60 Powdermill SWAMP AnuraSet BEANS BirdCLEF 2024 iNat2021

Benchmarks: iNatSounds SSW60 Powdermill SWAMP AnuraSet BEANS BirdCLEF 2024

Metrics: Top-1 accuracy Top-5 accuracy mAP mF1 ROC-AUC

Baselines: BirdNET Merlin Sound ID BEANS baselines (SVM, rn50p, rn152p, vggish) ImageNet-pretrained initialization

Builds on: SINR mixup mean teacher ImageNet pretraining BEANS

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy