atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Certified and empirical robustness

TabularBench: Benchmarking Adversarial Robustness for Tabular Deep Learning in Real-world Use-cases

NeurIPS 2024 · Adversarial robustness and security › Certified and empirical robustness · approach: Adversarial training with feature consistency · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces TabularBench, a benchmark and model zoo measuring adversarial (constrained) robustness of tabular deep learning classifiers across five real-world use cases, with and without synthetic data augmentation and adversarial training.

Problem

Adversarial evasion robustness of deep tabular models under realistic feature constraints has no standardized benchmark, and it is unclear how architectures, adversarial training, and data augmentation affect robustness.

Approach

Evaluates tabular DL classifiers with the Constrained Adaptive Attack (CAA) on five constrained binary tasks (CTU, LCLD, Malware, URL, WiDS), combining adversarial training with six synthetic-data augmentations (CTGAN, TVAE, WGAN, TableGAN, GOGGLE, Cutmix) and releasing a model zoo, dataset zoo, and leaderboard.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add adversarial trainingTabular deep learning architectures · CTU, LCLD, MALWARE, URL, and WIDSrobust accuracyHelped
Add data augmentation to standard trainingTabular deep learning architectures · CTU and URLrobust accuracyMixed
Use CTGAN data augmentationTabular deep learning models · All use casesID performanceHelped
Use Cutmix data augmentationTabular deep learning models with adversarial training · Across 20 architecture and task scenariosrobust accuracy: 7/20 scenariosHelped
Add data augmentation to adversarial trainingTabular deep learning models · URLrobust accuracyHelped
Increase perturbation size to ε=5 with AT plus augmentation rather than AT aloneTabNet · URLrobust accuracy: above 40%; 0%Helped
Use data augmentation with adversarial training rather than adversarial training aloneTabular deep learning models · URL, LCLD, and WIDSrobust accuracy: 4/20 scenariosMixed
Evaluate attacks without enforcing domain constraintsRobustness evaluation of tabular models · All use casesrobust accuracyHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: LCLD CTU-13 URL (ISCX-URL2016) WiDS Malware (PE files)

Benchmarks: LCLD CTU-13 URL WiDS Malware

Metrics: robust accuracy on constrained examples AUC accuracy MCC precision recall

Baselines: XGBoost TabTransformer TabNet RLN STG VIME

Builds on: CAA Constrained Adaptive Attack (CAPGD + MOEVA) RobustBench CTGAN Tableshift

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy