atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Variational and generative sampling

Covariate Shift Corrected Conditional Randomization Test

NeurIPS 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Variational and generative sampling · approach: Likelihood-free and graphical model estimation · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes csPCR, a covariate-shift-corrected Pearson chi-squared conditional randomization test that uses importance weights and control variates to test conditional independence in a target population using source data.

Problem

Testing conditional independence X ⊥ Y | Z in a target population when only labeled source data is available and covariates (X, Z, V) follow different distributions across populations (covariate shift), which invalidates standard CRT.

Approach

Extends the Pearson chi-squared CRT (PCR) by weighting label counts with density ratios e(X,Z,V)=P_T/P_S and reducing variance of weighted label sums via a weighted-regression control variate; the null distribution becomes a weighted sum of chi-squares.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use csPCR instead of ISConditional independence testing under covariate shift · Simulation, β = 1.4power: 0.33 -> 0.44Helped
Add control variates for power enhancement (ablation)csPCR · Simulation, β = 1.4power: 0.44 -> 0.8Helped
Use csPCR instead of ISConditional independence testing under covariate shift · Simulation, γ = 1power: 0.4 -> 0.62Helped
Add control variates for power enhancement (ablation)csPCR · Simulation, γ = 1power: 0.62 -> 0.86Helped
Add control variates for power enhancement (ablation)csPCR · Simulation, nonlinear indirect effect as θ approaches 1powerNo clear effect
Use csPCR instead of ISConditional independence testing under covariate shift · COVID-19 datasetp-value: 0.663 vs 0.025Mixed
Increase L (ablation)csPCR · Simulation, true density ratioType-I error rate: 0.05125 (L=2) -> 0.02425 (L=20)Mixed
Increase L (ablation)csPCR · Simulation, estimated density ratioType-I error rate: 0.04620 (L=2) -> 0.02175 (L=20)Mixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Simulated data Duke University Health System COVID-19 admissions (N=3,057)

Benchmarks: Simulated covariate-shift CI testing (Type-I error and power) COVID-19 90-day mortality dataset

Metrics: Type-I error rate power p-value

Baselines: IS method (importance-resampling CRT) PCR

Builds on: Conditional Randomization Test Pearson Chi-squared Conditional Randomization (PCR) model-X framework importance sampling CRT

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy