atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Matrix and tensor methods

Adversarially Robust Dense-Sparse Tradeoffs via Heavy-Hitters

NeurIPS 2024 · Learning theory and algorithms › Matrix and tensor methods · approach: Sparse regression with guarantees · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Improves the dense-sparse tradeoff for adversarially robust L_p heavy-hitters and L_p (F_p) estimation on turnstile streams using deterministic heavy-hitters, differential-privacy sketch ensembles, and a residual-moment estimator.

Problem

Adversarially robust L_p estimation and L_p heavy-hitters on turnstile streams, where prior dense-sparse techniques required about m^{p/(2p+1)} space and it was unknown whether this was a fundamental barrier.

Approach

Use a deterministic turnstile heavy-hitter algorithm (DetHH) for small universes and an ensemble of robust CountSketch instances (via differential privacy) for large universes, plus a subsampling-based residual F_p estimator independent of the tail size, so the flip number of the residual vector (rather than the full vector) governs space.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Track Lp heavy hitters using the proposed robust heavy-hitter algorithmAdversarial turnstile Lp estimation · Adversarial streams, p∈[1,2)space exponent: m^{p/(2p+1)} -> m^{(2p-2)/(4p-3)}Helped
Combine heavy-hitter tracking with residual moment estimationAdversarial turnstile Lp estimation · Adversarial streams, p∈(1,2)space exponent: m^{3/8}=m^{0.375} -> m^{47/126}≈m^{0.373}Helped
Track and remove the heavy coordinates when measuring flip numberAdversarially robust streaming algorithms · CAIDA sender IP trafficflip number: 1.24 to 1.31Helped
Track and remove the heavy coordinates when measuring flip numberAdversarially robust streaming algorithms · CAIDA sender IP traffic, α=4^{-1} to α=4^{-10}full-vector to residual flip-number ratio: 1.002 ... 1.6Helped
Track and remove the heavy coordinates when measuring flip numberAdversarially robust streaming algorithms · CAIDA sender IP traffic, ε=10^{-1} to ε=10^{-5}full-vector to residual flip-number ratio: 1.17 ... 1.75Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CAIDA traffic traces (equinix-nyc, ~3 million events, 12 minutes)

Benchmarks: CAIDA

Metrics: flip number of full vector vs residual vector space exponent of m

Baselines: Ben-Eliezer, Eden, Onak 2022 dense-sparse framework sketch switching computation paths DetHH

Builds on: dense-sparse tradeoff (Ben-Eliezer, Eden, Onak 2022) differential privacy adversarial robustness CountSketch sketch switching

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy