atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Graph self-supervised learning

Robust Node Classification on Graph Data with Graph and Label Noise

AAAI 2024 · Graph learning › Graph self-supervised learning · approach: Semi-supervised node representation learning · 32 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes RNCGLN, a self-attention-based node classifier that jointly handles graph noise and label noise via a graph contrastive loss, pseudo graphs, and pseudo labels.

Problem

Node classification on graph data where graph structure (missing/noisy edges) and labels are both noisy, a setting prior robust methods handle only one of at a time.

Approach

Uses multi-head self-attention as backbone for global graph learning, a multi-hop graph contrastive loss for local graph learning, and two self-improvement modules that iteratively replace the graph with a pseudo graph and the labels with confident pseudo labels.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use RNCGLN instead of the strongest baselineNode classification · Cora, Citeseer, Pubmed, Photo; clean and noisy settings in Table 1accuracy: 81.73±0.33 vs 79.34±0.54; 79.23±1.03 vs 75.61±1.54; 90.72±0.08 vs 85.83±0.34Helped
Add graph contrastive loss for local graph learning (ablation)RNCGLN · Cora {gr, lr}={.1, .3}accuracy: 53.93±0.66 -> 81.73±1.42Helped
Add node selection (ablation)RNCGLN · Cora {gr, lr}={.1, .3}accuracy: 81.56±1.56 -> 81.73±1.42Helped
Add pseudo graph and pseudo label self-improvement (ablation)RNCGLN · Cora, Citeseer, Pubmed, Photo under both noisy settingsaccuracy: 75.90±1.01 -> 81.73±1.42Helped
Add pseudo label while retaining pseudo graph (ablation)RNCGLN · Cora {gr, lr}={.1, .3}accuracy: 78.36±0.60 -> 81.73±1.42Helped
Add pseudo graph while retaining pseudo label (ablation)RNCGLN · Cora {gr, lr}={.1, .3}accuracy: 80.80±0.90 -> 81.73±1.42Helped
Increase label-noise ratioRNCGLN · Cora, Citeseer, Pubmed, PhotoaccuracyHurt
Increase graph-noise ratioRNCGLN · Cora, Citeseer, Pubmed, PhotoaccuracyHurt
Vary loss weight α (ablation)RNCGLN · Cora and Citeseer; {gr, lr}={0.3, 0.1} and {0.1, 0.3}accuracyMixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Cora Citeseer Pubmed Photo

Benchmarks: Cora Citeseer Pubmed Photo

Metrics: ACC standard deviation

Baselines: GCN GAT JLGCN IDGL NRGNN LAFAK

Builds on: Transformer self-attention efficient attention graph contrastive loss (Hu et al. 2021) self-training pseudo labels

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy