atlas

Research map / 3D vision / Depth and stereo

Metric from Human: Zero-shot Monocular Metric Depth Estimation via Test-time Adaptation

NeurIPS 2024 · 3D vision › Depth and stereo · approach: Self-supervised monocular depth · 3 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Metric from Human (MfH), a test-time adaptation method that paints humans into an image with generative painting, recovers their metric size with an HMR model, and learns a per-image metric head on top of a relative depth model for zero-shot monocular metric depth estimation.

Problem

Monocular metric depth estimation (MMDE) models trained with supervision generalize poorly to unseen scenes because they depend on training scenes to predict metric scale, requiring large labeled datasets.

Approach

Use humans as scene-independent metric landmarks: generative painting inserts people into the input, HMR gives their metric sizes (SMPL shape space in meters), and these pseudo metric depths supervise a per-image affine metric head on top of a frozen relative depth model, so no metric annotations are needed.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Apply test-time adaptation with generated humans as metric landmarksDepth Anything · NYUv2AbsRel: 38.8 -> 13.7Helped
Apply test-time adaptation with generated humans as metric landmarksDepth Anything · KITTIAbsRel: 47.3 -> 13.3Helped
Use generated-human test-time adaptation instead of the strongest many-shot baselineMfH · DIODE (Indoor)AbsRel: 18.1 -> 34.5Hurt
Use generated-human test-time adaptation instead of the strongest many-shot baselineMfH · iBims-1AbsRel: 14.4 -> 23.3Hurt
Use generated-human test-time adaptation instead of the strongest many-shot baselineMfH · ETH3DAbsRel: 32.6 -> 24.0Helped
Replace true depth targets with painted depth targets (ablation)ZoeDepth · NYUv2AbsRel: 22.4 -> 35.5Hurt
Replace true depth targets with painted depth targets (ablation)Marigold · NYUv2AbsRel: 5.88 -> 21.4Hurt
Use painted disparity targets instead of true disparity targets (ablation)Depth Anything · NYUv2AbsRel: 4.57 -> 21.9Hurt
Optimize all alignment and metric-head parameters sn, tn, s, t rather than only s, t (ablation)MfH · NYUv2AbsRel: 28.0 -> 21.9Helped
Replace SIlog loss with l1 loss (ablation)MfH · NYUv2AbsRel: 21.9 -> 201Hurt
Replace SIlog loss with l2 loss (ablation)MfH · NYUv2AbsRel: 21.9 -> 27.1Hurt
Replace SIlog loss with MSElog loss (ablation)MfH · NYUv2AbsRel: 21.9 -> 22.5Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: NYU-Depth V2 KITTI iBims-1 ETH3D DIODE

Benchmarks: NYU-Depth V2 KITTI DIODE (Indoor) iBims-1 ETH3D

Metrics: δ1 AbsRel SIlog RMSE

Baselines: ZoeDepth ZeroDepth Metric3D UniDepth-C UniDepth-V Depth Anything LORN DepthCLIP Hu et al.

Builds on: Depth Anything Stable Diffusion HMR 2.0 ZoeDepth SMPL

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy