atlas

Research map / Continual learning / Continual fine-tuning of LLMs

CoIN: A Benchmark of Continual Instruction Tuning for Multimodel Large Language Models

NeurIPS 2024 · Continual learning › Continual fine-tuning of LLMs · approach: Continual pretraining of language models

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces CoIN, a benchmark of 10 datasets over 8 tasks for continual instruction tuning of MLLMs, with Truth Alignment and LLM-graded Reasoning Capability metrics, and proposes MoELoRA to reduce forgetting.

Problem

Continual instruction tuning of multimodal LLMs has been overlooked and lacks public benchmarks; it is unclear whether MLLMs forget reasoning knowledge or instruction-following ability when tuned sequentially on diverse tasks.

Approach

A sequential instruction-tuning benchmark built from public vision-language datasets (adding classification and grounding tasks), paired with two evaluation axes (exact-match Truth Alignment and LLM-graded Reasoning Capability) that separate instruction-following forgetting from knowledge forgetting, plus a mixture-of-LoRA-experts method (MoELoRA) to mitigate forgetting.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use MoELoRA instead of the baseline sequential fine-tuningLLaVA on CoIN with 40% data · CoIN Truth AlignmentMAA: 33.18 -> 41.05Helped
Use MoELoRA instead of the baseline sequential fine-tuningLLaVA on CoIN with 40% data · CoIN Truth AlignmentBWT: -24.85 -> -22.50Helped
Increase the number of MoELoRA experts from 1 to 8 (ablation)LLaVA · CoIN Truth AlignmentMAA: 32.97 -> 42.76Helped
Use alphabetical instead of random task order (ablation)LLaVA · CoIN Truth AlignmentMAA: 32.97 -> 31.08Hurt
Use diverse task-specific templates instead of original templates (ablation)LLaVA · CoIN Truth AlignmentMAA: 32.97 -> 32.92No clear effect
Randomly choose among 10 instruction templates instead of original templates (ablation)LLaVA · CoIN Truth AlignmentMAA: 32.97 -> 38.37Helped
Increase training data volume from 10% to 40% (ablation)LLaVA · CoIN Truth AlignmentMAA: 30.27 -> 33.18Helped
Increase training data volume from 40% to 80% (ablation)LLaVA · CoIN Truth AlignmentMAA: 33.18 -> 30.00Hurt
Increase the backbone from 7B to 13B (ablation)LLaVA · CoIN Truth AlignmentMAA: 32.97 -> 39.43Helped
Increase LoRA rank from 128 to 192 (ablation)LLaVA with 40% data · CoIN Truth AlignmentMAA: 33.18 -> 38.31Helped
Increase LoRA rank from 128 to 256 (ablation)LLaVA with 40% data · CoIN Truth AlignmentBWT: -24.85 -> -19.8Helped
Sequentially fine-tune rather than multi-task fine-tuneLLaVA on CoIN · CoIN Truth AlignmentBWT: -32.62Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: VQAv2 VizWiz ScienceQA TextVQA GQA OCR-VQA ImageNet RefCOCO RefCOCO+ RefCOCOg

Benchmarks: CoIN

Metrics: accuracy IoU>0.5 accuracy for grounding MAA BWT LLM-graded reasoning score (0-10)

Baselines: Multi-task Zero-shot LwF EWC Qwen-VL MiniGPT-v2

Builds on: LoRA MoELoRA LwF EWC

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy