atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / OOD and anomaly detection

Are nuclear masks all you need for improved out-of-domain generalisation? A closer look at cancer classification in histopathology

NeurIPS 2024 · Label-efficient and robust learning › OOD and anomaly detection · approach: Robust fine-tuning for OOD generalization · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes training a ResNet-50 on H&E tiles plus nuclear segmentation masks with an l2 regulariser aligning image and mask embeddings, improving single-domain generalisation for tumour classification across CAMELYON17, BCSS and Ocelot.

Problem

Single-domain generalisation for cancer tumour vs non-tumour tile classification in histopathology, where stain, scanner and hospital differences hurt out-of-domain accuracy.

Approach

Train on H&E images together with binary nuclear masks (and 50% mask-times-image inputs), adding an l2 loss that pulls the pre-GAP embedding of the image toward that of its nuclear mask, so the model relies on nuclear shape and organisation rather than colour/texture; no masks are needed at inference.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Train with nuclear masks and ℓ₂ feature alignment, with photometric augmentationResNet-50 · CAMELYON17 OODaccuracy: 89.1±1.1 -> 91.8±0.9Helped
Train with nuclear masks and ℓ₂ feature alignment, with photometric augmentationResNet-50 · BCSS OODaccuracy: 75.1±1.3 -> 78.8±1.6Helped
Train with nuclear masks and ℓ₂ feature alignment, with photometric augmentationResNet-50 · Ocelot OODaccuracy: 69.1±1.1 -> 70.6±1.0Helped
Add ℓ₂ feature-alignment regularisation (ablation)Ours with nuclear masks and photometric augmentation · CAMELYON17 OODaccuracy: 87.8±1.7 -> 91.8±0.9Helped
Add ℓ₂ regularisation and mask-times-input augmentation (ablation)Ours-MO-Aug · CAMELYON17 OODaccuracy: 84.5±2.7 -> 91.8±0.9Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CAMELYON17 BCSS Ocelot CoNSeP

Benchmarks: CAMELYON17 BCSS Ocelot

Metrics: tile-level accuracy accuracy drop under image corruptions PGD adversarial accuracy recall

Baselines: ERM Macenko normalisation HoVer-Net pretrained ResNet-50 RandStainNA RSC L2D DDCA

Builds on: RandStainNA Learning to Diversify HoVer-Net Representation Self-Challenging

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy