atlas

Research map / Bandits and online learning / RL theory and MDPs

Beating Adversarial Low-Rank MDPs with Unknown Transition and Bandit Feedback

NeurIPS 2024 · Bandits and online learning › RL theory and MDPs · approach: Adversarial MDPs with bandit feedback · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Improves full-information adversarial low-rank MDP regret from T^{5/6} to T^{2/3} and gives the first bandit-feedback algorithms with unknown transitions (inefficient T^{2/3} model-based/model-free, oracle-efficient T^{4/5}) under linear loss structure.

Problem

Regret minimization in adversarial low-rank MDPs with unknown transitions and unknown features, under full-information or bandit loss feedback.

Approach

A two-phase design separating reward-free representation learning (model-based or model-free, e.g., VoX/policy cover) from exponential-weights policy optimization, with a novel off-policy loss estimator that uses learned features and occupancies plus an exploration bonus; linear loss structure is used to bound the policy class size independent of states.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Separate initial transition representation learning from policy optimizationAdversarial low-rank MDP model-based learning · Full-information feedbackregret bound: \mathcal{O}(T^{\nicefrac{5}{6}}) -> \mathrm{Reg}_T \le \otil\left(H^3 \left(d^2 + |\mathcal{A}|\right)T^{\frac{2}{3}}\riHelped
Impose linear structure on the loss functionAdversarial low-rank MDP bandit learning · Bandit feedback with unknown transitionsdependence of regret on state-space sizeHelped
Use a model-free algorithm instead of a model-based algorithmAdversarial low-rank MDP bandit learning · Bandit feedback with linear lossesregret bound: \mathrm{poly}(d,A,H)T^{\nicefrac{2}{3}} -> \mathrm{poly}(A,d,H,\log(|\Phi|/\delta))\cdot T^{\nicefrac{4}{5}}Mixed
Use spanner policies and assume access to the loss featureModel-free oracle-efficient bandit algorithm · Adaptive adversaryregret bound: \mathrm{poly}(A,d,H,\log(|\Phi|/\delta))\cdot T^{\nicefrac{4}{5}}Helped
Remove structure from the loss functionAdversarial low-rank MDP bandit learning · Bandit feedback with unknown transitionsregret lower bound: \Omega(\sqrt{|\mathcal{X}| |\mathcal{A}| T})Hurt
Use full-information rather than bandit feedbackAdversarial low-rank MDP learning with unstructured losses · Unknown transitionsregret lower bound: \Omega(\sqrt{|\mathcal{A}| T}) vs. \Omega(\sqrt{|\mathcal{X}| |\mathcal{A}| T})Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: regret bound (theoretical)

Baselines: Zhao et al. (2024) Foster et al. (2022)

Builds on: Zhao et al. 2024 adversarial low-rank MDP Foster et al. 2022 low-rank MDP bandit VoX RepLearn John's exploration

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy