atlas

Research map / Optimization / Optimizers

QLABGrad: A Hyperparameter-Free and Convergence-Guaranteed Scheme for Deep Learning

AAAI 2024 · Optimization › Optimizers · approach: Constrained and non-backprop training · 10 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes QLABGrad, a hyperparameter-free learning rate scheme that fits a quadratic to the loss along the gradient direction using one extra forward pass, with a convergence proof under Lipschitz-smooth loss.

Problem

Choosing learning rates for deep network training typically requires empirical tuning or trial and error; existing adaptive schemes add hyperparameters or lack convergence guarantees.

Approach

Approximate the loss along the negative gradient direction by a quadratic in the step size, determined by the current loss, gradient norm, and loss at one pre-learning rate; the minimizer gives the learning rate, with a fallback to the pre-learning rate when it is negative, and a convergence guarantee under M-Lipschitz smoothness.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use QLABGrad instead of LQAMLP · MNIST testaccuracy: 98.47 -> 98.36Hurt
Use QLABGrad instead of SGDCNN · MNIST testaccuracy: 99.09 -> 99.18Helped
Use QLABGrad instead of HGDCNN · MNIST testaccuracy: 99.06 -> 99.18Helped
Use QLABGrad instead of the other tested optimizersCNN · MNISTtraining lossHelped
Use QLABGrad instead of the compared schemesResNet-18 · CIFAR-10training lossHelped
Use QLABGrad instead of the compared methodsResNet-18 · Tiny-ImageNettraining lossHelped
Use QLABGrad instead of SGDdeep learning training · MNIST, CIFAR-10, and Tiny-ImageNettraining time: about 1.4 timesHurt
Use QLABGrad with FindPLR instead of relying on a fixed, potentially suboptimal pre-learning rateQLABGrad · deep learning taskstraining lossHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MNIST CIFAR-10 Tiny-ImageNet

Benchmarks: MNIST CIFAR-10 Tiny-ImageNet

Metrics: test accuracy training loss learning rate trajectories wall-clock time overhead

Baselines: SGD RMSProp Adagrad Adam HGD L4GD LQA E-decay SS-decay CA-decay

Builds on: Box-Kanemasu method L4 LQA Adam hypergradient descent

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy