atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / CNN design

Dendritic Integration Inspired Artificial Neural Networks Capture Data Correlation

NeurIPS 2024 · Architectures and efficiency › CNN design · approach: Biologically inspired CNN explanation · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes quadratic neurons with channel-wise quadratic integration (Dit-CNNs) that provably capture data covariance and improves ResNet and ConvNeXt on CIFAR and ImageNet-1K with minimal parameter overhead.

Problem

Standard neurons use linear integration plus nonlinearity, which may not capture input correlations in structured data and can require many training samples; the paper asks whether dendrite-inspired quadratic integration improves generalization and CNN accuracy.

Approach

Quadratic neurons f(x)=x^T A x + w·x + b whose expected quadratic term encodes covariance (tr(AΣ)); integrated channel-wise into a single CNN layer (Dit-CNN), following the biological dendritic quadratic integration rule, rather than pixel-wise as in prior quadratic convolutions.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Replace one ResNet layer with channel-wise quadratic neuronsResNet-20 · CIFAR-10accuracy: 91.25% -> 92.66%Helped
Replace one ResNet layer with channel-wise quadratic neuronsResNet-32 · CIFAR-100accuracy: 68.52±0.55% -> 69.68±0.32%Helped
Replace one ConvNeXt layer with channel-wise quadratic neuronsConvNeXt-T · ImageNet-1Ktop-1 accuracy: 82.1 -> 82.6Helped
Replace one ConvNeXt layer with channel-wise quadratic neuronsConvNeXt-S · ImageNet-1Ktop-1 accuracy: 83.1 -> 83.6Helped
Replace one ConvNeXt layer with channel-wise quadratic neuronsConvNeXt-B · ImageNet-1Ktop-1 accuracy: 83.8 -> 84.2Helped
Omit covariance term tr(AΣ) (ablation)Dit-ResNet-32 · CIFAR-10accuracy: 93.17% -> 37.78%Hurt
Omit quadratic term x^T Ax (ablation)Dit-ResNet-32 · CIFAR-10accuracy: 93.17% -> 12.11%Hurt
Omit covariance term tr(AΣ) (ablation)Dit-ResNet-32 · CIFAR-100accuracy: 69.68% -> 22.33%Hurt
Omit quadratic term x^T Ax (ablation)Dit-ResNet-32 · CIFAR-100accuracy: 69.68% -> 1.32%Hurt
Omit covariance term tr(AΣ) (ablation)Dit-ConvNeXt-T · ImageNet-1Ktop-1 accuracy: 82.6% -> 73.7%Hurt
Omit quadratic term x^T Ax (ablation)Dit-ConvNeXt-T · ImageNet-1Ktop-1 accuracy: 82.6% -> 70.6%Hurt
Use pixel-wise rather than channel-wise quadratic neurons (ablation)ConvNeXt-T · ImageNet-1Ktop-1 accuracy: 82.6 -> 82.2Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 ImageNet-1K MNIST Arabic MNIST

Benchmarks: CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 ImageNet-1K MNIST Arabic MNIST

Metrics: top-1 accuracy test accuracy parameter count FLOPs

Baselines: ResNet-20 ResNet-32 ResNet-56 ResNet-110 QResNet QuadraResNet Swin-T VMamba-T SLaK-T QuadraNet36 DeepMAD ConvNeXt-T

Builds on: ResNet ConvNeXt QResNet QuadraNet

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy