atlas

Research map / Point clouds / Registration and matching

3D Focusing-and-Matching Network for Multi-Instance Point Cloud Registration

NeurIPS 2024 · Point clouds › Registration and matching · approach: Learned feature-based registration · 6 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes 3DFMNet, a two-stage focusing-and-matching network that first regresses object centers via attention-based correlation with the CAD model and then performs dual-masked pairwise registration per object proposal for multi-instance point cloud registration.

Problem

Multi-instance point cloud registration: estimating poses of all instances of a model point cloud in a cluttered, occluded scene, where global correspondence plus clustering is unreliable.

Approach

Decompose one-to-many multi-instance registration into multiple pair-wise registrations by first localizing object centers (self/cross-attention correlation with the CAD model, offset and mask prediction, DBSCAN clustering) and then matching each ball-query object proposal to the model using an instance mask and an overlap mask.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use 3DFMNet instead of MIRETRMulti-instance registration · ROBI testMR (%): 38.51 -> 46.81Helped
Use 3DFMNet instead of MIRETRMulti-instance registration · ROBI testMP (%): 41.19 -> 50.61Helped
Use 3DFMNet instead of MIRETRMulti-instance registration · ROBI testMF (%): 39.80 -> 48.63Helped
Use 3DFMNet instead of ECCMulti-instance registration · Scan2CAD testMR (%): 96.52 -> 95.44Hurt
Use 3DFMNet instead of MIRETRMulti-instance registration · Scan2CAD testMP (%): 91.21 -> 94.15Helped
Use 3DFMNet instead of MIRETRMulti-instance registration · Scan2CAD testMF (%): 93.40 -> 94.79Helped
Use ground-truth object centers instead of predicted centers3DFMNet · Scan2CAD testMF (%): 94.79 -> 96.14Helped
Use ground-truth object centers instead of predicted centers3DFMNet · ROBI testMF (%): 48.63 -> 57.38Helped
Reduce sampled points from 4096 to 1024 (ablation)3DFMNet · Scan2CADMR (%): 95.44% -> 83.76%Hurt
Increase sampled points from 4096 to 8192 (ablation)3DFMNet · Scan2CADMR (%): 95.44% -> 95.20%Hurt
Add the overlap mask (ablation)3DFMNet · Scan2CADMR (%): 94.76% -> 95.44%Helped
Add the overlap mask (ablation)3DFMNet · Scan2CADMP (%): 93.30% -> 94.15%Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Scan2CAD ROBI ShapeNet

Benchmarks: Scan2CAD ROBI

Metrics: MR MP MF RTE RRE PIR RMSE

Baselines: T-Linkage RansaCov PointCLM ECC MIRETR

Builds on: KPConv MIRETR PointCLM circle loss

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy