atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Recognition and long-tail

Fourier Amplitude and Correlation Loss: Beyond Using L2 Loss for Skillful Precipitation Nowcasting

NeurIPS 2024 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Recognition and long-tail · approach: Correspondence and causal representation learning · 5 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Fourier Amplitude and Correlation Loss (FACL), an alternating FAL/FCL loss replacing MSE for spatiotemporal precipitation nowcasting, plus a new Regional Histogram Divergence metric.

Problem

Deep precipitation nowcasting models trained with pixel-wise L2 losses (MSE) produce blurry predictions with limited operational utility, while generative alternatives are slow and non-deterministic.

Approach

Replace MSE with a parameter-free Fourier loss that alternates between a Fourier Amplitude Loss (sharpness) and a Fourier Correlation Loss (structure), with alternation probability shifting toward FAL over training, plus a sigmoid output layer; also proposes RHD, a histogram-based patch metric tolerant to local shifts.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Replace MSE with FACLConvLSTM · Stochastic Moving-MNISTLPIPS: 0.2538 -> 0.1092Helped
Replace MSE with FACLConvLSTM · Stochastic Moving-MNISTFSS: 0.6148 -> 0.8172Helped
Replace MSE with FACLConvLSTM · Stochastic Moving-MNISTMAE: 196.4 -> 180.1Helped
Replace MSE with FACLConvLSTM · SEVIRLPIPS: 0.3683 -> 0.3508Helped
Replace MSE with FACLConvLSTM · SEVIRCSI-m: 0.3957 -> 0.3984Helped
Replace MSE with FACLConvLSTM · MeteoNetLPIPS: 0.1504 -> 0.1252Helped
Replace MSE with FACLConvLSTM · HKO-7FSS: 0.2653 -> 0.4045Helped
Add Fourier Correlation Loss to FAL (ablation)ConvLSTM with FAL · Stochastic Moving-MNISTLPIPS: 0.5854 -> 0.1092Helped
Add Fourier Amplitude Loss to FCL (ablation)ConvLSTM with FCL · Stochastic Moving-MNISTLPIPS: 0.2102 -> 0.1092Helped
Set α to 0.2 instead of 0.0 (ablation)PredRNN with FACL · Stochastic Moving-MNISTLPIPS: 0.0997 -> 0.0806Helped
Set α to 0.3 instead of 0.0 (ablation)ConvLSTM with FACL · SEVIRLPIPS: 0.3502 -> 0.3312Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Stochastic Moving-MNIST N-body-MNIST SEVIR MeteoNet HKO-7

Benchmarks: Stochastic Moving-MNIST N-body-MNIST SEVIR MeteoNet HKO-7

Metrics: MAE SSIM LPIPS FVD FSS RHD CSI pooled CSI

Baselines: MSE LDCast MCVD PreDiff STRPM

Builds on: ConvLSTM PredRNN SimVP Earthformer Focal Frequency Loss

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy