atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Domain adaptation and generalization

Open-Set Graph Domain Adaptation via Separate Domain Alignment

AAAI 2024 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Domain adaptation and generalization · approach: Source-free domain adaptation · 14 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces open-set graph domain adaptation for node classification and proposes Separate Domain Alignment (SDA), which adversarially aligns confident target nodes and clusters uncertain ones via neighbor center clustering.

Problem

Cross-network node classification under domain shift where the target graph contains unknown classes absent from the labeled source graph; existing graph domain adaptation methods assume a closed label space and suffer negative transfer.

Approach

Splits target nodes into certain and uncertain groups by prediction entropy; certain nodes are aligned to the source via adversarial domain alignment, while uncertain nodes are clustered via a neighbor center clustering loss that pulls them toward K-means cluster centers and source class centers.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use SDA instead of the strongest baseline for AccOpen-set graph domain adaptation · A→DAcc: 60.54 -> 61.60Helped
Use SDA instead of the strongest baseline for AccOpen-set graph domain adaptation · D→AAcc: 53.27 -> 51.36Hurt
Use SDA instead of the strongest baseline for AccOpen-set graph domain adaptation · A→CAcc: 63.23 -> 64.47Helped
Use SDA instead of the strongest baseline for AccOpen-set graph domain adaptation · C→AAcc: 60.44 -> 61.67Helped
Use SDA instead of the strongest baseline for AccOpen-set graph domain adaptation · C→DAcc: 64.29 -> 67.51Helped
Use SDA instead of the strongest baseline for AccOpen-set graph domain adaptation · D→CAcc: 57.62 -> 57.74Helped
Add neighbor center clustering to source cross-entropy training (ablation)SDA · D→AHS: 38.70 -> 45.67Helped
Add adversarial domain alignment to source cross-entropy training (ablation)SDA · D→AHS: 38.70 -> 48.34Helped
Add neighbor center clustering alongside adversarial domain alignment (ablation)SDA · D→AHS: 48.34 -> 50.86Helped
Vary the neighbor-center cluster count K (ablation)SDA · D→AHSHelped
Increase the neighbor center clustering loss weight β (ablation)SDA · D→AAccuHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ACMv9 DBLPv7 Citationv1

Benchmarks: ACMv9 DBLPv7 Citationv1

Metrics: Acc Acc_known Acc_unknown h-score

Baselines: GCN GraphSAGE DANN CDAN OSBP DANCE UDAGCN ASN

Builds on: DANCE OSBP ASN UDAGCN PPMI-based GCN

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy