Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Attacks on text and graphs
On the Robustness of Neural-Enhanced Video Streaming against Adversarial Attacks
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Proposes codec hijacking, a man-in-the-middle adversarial attack on neural-enhanced video streaming that jointly optimizes invisible input perturbation and a malicious macroblock QP matrix so the codec conceals the perturbation until decoding and SR amplify it.
Problem
Neural-enhanced video streaming (NeVS) pipelines, which combine video codecs with neural super-resolution on the receiver side, are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, yet existing codec-unaware attacks fail because the encoder filters high-frequency perturbations.
Approach
Jointly search segment-level invisible perturbation on low-resolution frames and a macroblock-level QP matrix under the original bitstream size budget, so normal encoding hides the perturbation while the malicious encoding lets it survive and be amplified by SR models.
Key results
- Codec hijacking drops restored-frame PSNR for 11 SR models to roughly 14-21 dB (e.g., ESRGAN 14.13 dB) while attacked LR frames stay above 32 dB PSNR.
- Multiple object tracking MOTA falls from about 80-83% to 32-41% with attack success rates of 75-81% using ESRGAN.
- Human pose estimation PCK drops from about 87-98% to 32-38% with attack success rates of 82-87%.
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apply codec hijacking to ESRGAN-enhanced NeVS | NeVS object tracking on Pedestrian · Pedestrian | MOTA (%): 82.9 -> 41.2 | Hurt |
| Apply codec hijacking to ESRGAN-enhanced NeVS | NeVS object tracking on Station · Station | MOTA (%): 83.4 -> 37.8 | Hurt |
| Apply codec hijacking to ESRGAN-enhanced NeVS | NeVS object tracking on Market · Market | MOTA (%): 79.5 -> 31.7 | Hurt |
| Apply codec hijacking to ESRGAN-enhanced NeVS | NeVS object tracking on Street · Street | MOTA (%): 80.3 -> 33.2 | Hurt |
| Apply codec hijacking to ESRGAN-enhanced NeVS | NeVS human pose estimation · Human3.6M, Head | PCK (%): 97.8 -> 38.2 | Hurt |
| Apply codec hijacking to ESRGAN-enhanced NeVS | NeVS human pose estimation · Human3.6M, Elbow | PCK (%): 90.2 -> 34.8 | Hurt |
| Apply codec hijacking to ESRGAN-enhanced NeVS | NeVS human pose estimation · Human3.6M, Wrist | PCK (%): 87.1 -> 32.3 | Hurt |
| Apply codec hijacking to ESRGAN-enhanced NeVS | NeVS human pose estimation · Human3.6M, Knee | PCK (%): 96.5 -> 36.4 | Hurt |
| Apply codec hijacking to ESRGAN-enhanced NeVS | NeVS human pose estimation · Human3.6M, Ankle | PCK (%): 91.9 -> 33.7 | Hurt |
| Apply codec hijacking across SR enhancement models | UDM10 NeVS video restoration · UDM10 | PSNR | Hurt |
| Remove malicious QP-matrix encoding from codec hijacking (ablation) | Codec hijacking · NeVS video restoration | visual restoration quality | No clear effect |
Surprising findings
- Perturbation injection alone without malicious QP encoding has almost no effect on restored video, so the codec itself acts as the trigger.
- GAN-based SR models such as ESRGAN and NATSR are the most damaged, because they amplify injected high-frequency perturbation.
Limitations
- Attack assumes a man-in-the-middle position that can modify the LR video before streaming and control QP via standard codec APIs.
- Evaluation is limited to UDM10 and a few downstream tasks with ESRGAN as the main SR example for downstream results.
- No defense is proposed or evaluated.
Experimental setup
Datasets: UDM10 MOTChallenge Human3.6M
Benchmarks: UDM10 MOTChallenge Human3.6M
Metrics: PSNR SSIM MOTA PCK attack success rate
Baselines: I-FGSM PGD FDA
Builds on: I-FGSM PGD H.264/AVC H.265/HEVC
Closest papers by meaning
- DeNC: Unleash Neural Codecs in Video Streaming with Diffusion Enhancement (AAAI 2025 · similarity 0.85)
- I2VGuard: Safeguarding Images against Misuse in Diffusion-based Image-to-Video Models (CVPR 2025 · similarity 0.82)
- Comparing the Robustness of Modern No-Reference Image- and Video-Quality Metrics to Adversarial Attacks (AAAI 2024 · similarity 0.82)
- Image Hijacks: Adversarial Images can Control Generative Models at Runtime (ICML 2024 · similarity 0.82)
- Adversarial Attacks on Federated-Learned Adaptive Bitrate Algorithms (AAAI 2024 · similarity 0.81)
- Towards Effective and Sparse Adversarial Attack on Spiking Neural Networks via Breaking Invisible Surrogate Gradients (CVPR 2025 · similarity 0.81)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
