atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Attacks on text and graphs

On the Robustness of Neural-Enhanced Video Streaming against Adversarial Attacks

AAAI 2024 · Adversarial robustness and security › Attacks on text and graphs · approach: Biologically inspired robust vision · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes codec hijacking, a man-in-the-middle adversarial attack on neural-enhanced video streaming that jointly optimizes invisible input perturbation and a malicious macroblock QP matrix so the codec conceals the perturbation until decoding and SR amplify it.

Problem

Neural-enhanced video streaming (NeVS) pipelines, which combine video codecs with neural super-resolution on the receiver side, are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, yet existing codec-unaware attacks fail because the encoder filters high-frequency perturbations.

Approach

Jointly search segment-level invisible perturbation on low-resolution frames and a macroblock-level QP matrix under the original bitstream size budget, so normal encoding hides the perturbation while the malicious encoding lets it survive and be amplified by SR models.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Apply codec hijacking to ESRGAN-enhanced NeVSNeVS object tracking on Pedestrian · PedestrianMOTA (%): 82.9 -> 41.2Hurt
Apply codec hijacking to ESRGAN-enhanced NeVSNeVS object tracking on Station · StationMOTA (%): 83.4 -> 37.8Hurt
Apply codec hijacking to ESRGAN-enhanced NeVSNeVS object tracking on Market · MarketMOTA (%): 79.5 -> 31.7Hurt
Apply codec hijacking to ESRGAN-enhanced NeVSNeVS object tracking on Street · StreetMOTA (%): 80.3 -> 33.2Hurt
Apply codec hijacking to ESRGAN-enhanced NeVSNeVS human pose estimation · Human3.6M, HeadPCK (%): 97.8 -> 38.2Hurt
Apply codec hijacking to ESRGAN-enhanced NeVSNeVS human pose estimation · Human3.6M, ElbowPCK (%): 90.2 -> 34.8Hurt
Apply codec hijacking to ESRGAN-enhanced NeVSNeVS human pose estimation · Human3.6M, WristPCK (%): 87.1 -> 32.3Hurt
Apply codec hijacking to ESRGAN-enhanced NeVSNeVS human pose estimation · Human3.6M, KneePCK (%): 96.5 -> 36.4Hurt
Apply codec hijacking to ESRGAN-enhanced NeVSNeVS human pose estimation · Human3.6M, AnklePCK (%): 91.9 -> 33.7Hurt
Apply codec hijacking across SR enhancement modelsUDM10 NeVS video restoration · UDM10PSNRHurt
Remove malicious QP-matrix encoding from codec hijacking (ablation)Codec hijacking · NeVS video restorationvisual restoration qualityNo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: UDM10 MOTChallenge Human3.6M

Benchmarks: UDM10 MOTChallenge Human3.6M

Metrics: PSNR SSIM MOTA PCK attack success rate

Baselines: I-FGSM PGD FDA

Builds on: I-FGSM PGD H.264/AVC H.265/HEVC

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy