atlas

Research map / Federated learning and privacy / Personalized and heterogeneous FL

On Disentanglement of Asymmetrical Knowledge Transfer for Modality-Task Agnostic Federated Learning

AAAI 2024 · Federated learning and privacy › Personalized and heterogeneous FL · approach: Non-IID federated learning · 14 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Formulates modality-task agnostic federated learning (AFL) and proposes DisentAFL, which uses two-stage knowledge disentanglement and gating to split asymmetrical inter-client knowledge sharing into symmetrical sub-schemes.

Problem

Federated learning across clients with different input modalities, downstream tasks, domains and concepts creates asymmetrical pairwise knowledge relationships, making it hard to maximize positive transfer and minimize negative transfer between clients.

Approach

Disentangles the asymmetrical inter-client information-sharing scheme into several independent symmetrical schemes via coarse group-wise (encoder/decoder) and fine-grained knowledge-type disentanglement, realized with a supernetwork of mixture-of-experts layers (MoDE, MoME, MoTE), disentanglement losses, and sparsely-gated client routing.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use DisentAFL-Avg instead of Cross-PFLAFL clients · MERGE-ACaccuracy: 81.58 ± 0.53 -> 82.66 ± 0.74Helped
Use DisentAFL-Avg instead of Cross-PFLAFL clients · Vehicle-xMaccuracy: 86.82 ± 0.38 -> 88.56 ± 0.22Helped
Use DisentAFL-KD instead of Cross-PFLAFL clients · ModelNet-xMaccuracy: 94.20 ± 0.25 -> 96.62 ± 0.16Helped
Use DisentAFL-Avg instead of Cross-PFLAFL clients · MERGE-VMaccuracy: 90.11 ± 0.63 -> 96.38 ± 0.41Helped
Use DisentAFL-Avg instead of Cross-PFLAFL clients · MERGE-MMaccuracy: 75.37 ± 0.26 -> 75.68 ± 0.74No clear effect
Add the stage-one auxiliary loss (ablation)DisentAFL-KD · MERGE-FAaccuracy: 88.44 ± 0.36 -> 91.51 ± 0.36Helped
Add the stage-two auxiliary loss (ablation)DisentAFL-KD · MERGE-FAaccuracy: 87.93 ± 0.93 -> 91.51 ± 0.36Helped
Add the stage-one auxiliary loss (ablation)DisentAFL-Avg · MERGE-FAaccuracy: 85.56 ± 0.31 -> 93.30 ± 0.25Helped
Add the stage-two auxiliary loss (ablation)DisentAFL-Avg · MERGE-FAaccuracy: 86.48 ± 0.41 -> 93.30 ± 0.25Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MERGE dataset simulations ModelNet40 (multi-view) Vehicle driving dataset MNIST/Omniglot-style image classification (Finn et al.) audio-image classification dataset (Liang et al.)

Benchmarks: MERGE-AC Vehicle-xM ModelNet-xM MERGE-VM MERGE-MM MERGE-FA

Metrics: average testing accuracy over clients

Baselines: Local FedAvg Cross-FedAvg Align-FedAvg Cross-PFL FedMSplit

Builds on: FedAvg FedMSplit personalized federated learning federated knowledge distillation

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy