atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Knowledge and temporal graphs

NeuroGraph: Benchmarks for Graph Machine Learning in Brain Connectomics

NeurIPS 2023 · Graph learning › Knowledge and temporal graphs · approach: Continuous-time dynamic graph learning · 9 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use correlation matrix as node features instead of BOLD signals (ablation)10 GNNs · HCP-Gender (100/400/1000 ROIs)accuracy: 48.15 -> 78.80Helped
combine BOLD signals with correlation features (ablation)GNNs · HCP-Genderaccuracy: 78.80 -> 51.30Hurt
increase number of ROIs from 100 to 1000 (ablation)GNNs with correlation features · HCP-Genderaverage accuracy: 67.30 -> 72.98Helped
sparsify graph (sparse vs medium) at 1000 ROIs (ablation)GNNs · HCP-Genderaccuracy: 78.80 -> 82.13Mixed
use dense instead of sparse graph for k-GNN at 1000 ROIs (ablation)k-GNN · HCP-Genderaccuracy: 82.13 -> 61.57Hurt
add residual connections with message passing (GNN*)GNN · HCP-Genderaccuracy: 86.67 -> 89.07Helped
GNN* versus best standard GNNGNN* · HCP-Ageaccuracy: 44.98 -> 50.23Helped
GNN* versus best standard GNN on regressionGNN* · HCP-WMMAE: 0.789 -> 0.751Helped
GNN versus 3-layer NN on classificationstandard GNNs · HCP-Taskaccuracy: 97.78 -> 95.2Mixed

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy