atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Domain adaptation and generalization

Multi-Source Collaborative Gradient Discrepancy Minimization for Federated Domain Generalization

AAAI 2024 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Domain adaptation and generalization · approach: Optimization-based domain generalization · 15 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes MCGDM, a federated domain generalization method that minimizes intra-domain gradient discrepancy (original vs. RandAugment images) and inter-domain gradient discrepancy (against other clients' classifier heads), extended to federated domain adaptation via pseudo-labeling.

Problem

Federated domain generalization: learning a domain-invariant model from decentralized, isolated source domains (privacy constraints) that generalizes to an unseen target domain, and extending this to federated domain adaptation.

Approach

Instead of sharing style or data across clients, align classifier-head gradients between original and augmented images within each client (intra-domain) and between the current client's classifier and other domains' classifier heads (inter-domain), so local models update toward domain-invariant directions.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use MCGDM instead of CDGfederated domain generalization · PACSaccuracy (Avg): 85.8 -> 86.2Helped
Use MCGDM instead of DAELfederated domain generalization · Office-Homeaccuracy (Avg): 66.1 -> 66.8Helped
Use MCGDM instead of CASCfederated domain generalization · VLCSaccuracy (Avg): 76.2 -> 78.1Helped
Use MCGDM instead of COPAfederated domain adaptation · Digit-5accuracy (Avg): 95.4 -> 97.1Helped
Use MCGDM instead of CAiDAfederated domain adaptation · Office-Caltech10accuracy (Avg): 98.4 -> 98.6Helped
Add RandAug to the FedAvg baseline (ablation)PACS FedDG · PACSaccuracy (Avg): 81.3 -> 83.9Helped
Add intra-domain gradient matching to RandAug baseline (ablation)PACS FedDG · PACSaccuracy (Avg): 83.9 -> 85.5Helped
Add inter-domain gradient matching to RandAug baseline (ablation)PACS FedDG · PACSaccuracy (Avg): 83.9 -> 85.4Helped
Add both intra-domain and inter-domain gradient matching (ablation)PACS FedDG with RandAug · PACSaccuracy (Avg): 83.9 -> 86.2Helped
Replace gradient matching with KL alignment (ablation)PACS FedDG alignment strategy · PACSaccuracy (Avg): 86.2 -> 84.8Hurt
Replace gradient matching with SupCon alignment (ablation)PACS FedDG alignment strategy · PACSaccuracy (Avg): 86.2 -> 84.8Hurt
Replace gradient matching with CoFC alignment (ablation)PACS FedDG alignment strategy · PACSaccuracy (Avg): 86.2 -> 84.2Hurt

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: PACS VLCS Office-Home Digit-5 Office-Caltech10

Benchmarks: PACS VLCS Office-Home Digit-5 Office-Caltech10

Metrics: accuracy

Baselines: DeepAll JiGen EISNet L2A-OT DDAIG FACT MixStyle StyleNeo RSC CDG DAEL FedAvg

Builds on: FedAvg RandAugment COPA MixStyle

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy