atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Attacks on text and graphs

Are Defenses for Graph Neural Networks Robust?

NeurIPS 2022 · Adversarial robustness and security › Attacks on text and graphs · approach: Graph neural network robustness · 11 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
replace non-adaptive transfer attacks with adaptive attacks7 GNN defenses (Jaccard-GCN, SVD-GCN, ProGNN, GRAND, GNNGuard, RGCN, Soft-Median-GDC) · Cora-ML and Citeseer(R)AUC robustness: -40% on averageHurt
use defenses instead of undefended tuned GCNGNN defenses · Cora-ML and Citeseer, global and localadversarial accuracy under adaptive attackNo clear effect
use GRAND or Soft-Median-GDC instead of GCNGCN · Cora-ML and Citeseeradversarial accuracyMixed
use SVD-GCN defense instead of GCNGCN · Cora-MLadversarial accuracy: 24%/9%Hurt
higher clean accuracy of defensesGNN defenses · Cora-ML global attacksRAUCHelped

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy