atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Certified and empirical robustness

Your Out-of-Distribution Detection Method is Not Robust!

NeurIPS 2022 · Adversarial robustness and security › Certified and empirical robustness · approach: Regularized defenses against attacks · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use ATD instead of HAT (OpenMax)OOD detection on CIFAR-10 · CIFAR-10, in and out attackedAUROC: 0.415 -> 0.693Helped
Use ATD instead of HAT (MD)OOD detection on CIFAR-100 · CIFAR-100, in and out attackedAUROC: 0.363 -> 0.553Helped
Add a HAT robust feature extractor instead of a standard-trained feature extractor (ablation)ATD on CIFAR-10 · CIFAR-10, in and out attackedAUROC: 0.029 -> 0.693Helped
Add adversarial training to the discriminator (ablation)ATD on CIFAR-10 · CIFAR-10, in and out attackedAUROC: 0.511 -> 0.693Helped
Generate OOD features rather than images, using a feature extractor (ablation)ATD on CIFAR-10 · CIFAR-10, in and out attackedAUROC: 0.560 -> 0.693Helped
Do not adversarially attack generated samples during training (ablation)ATD on CIFAR-10 · CIFAR-10, in and out attackedAUROC: 0.546 -> 0.560Helped

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy