atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Dynamical systems

Investigation into Training Dynamics of Learned Optimizers (Student Abstract)

AAAI 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Dynamical systems · approach: Latent dynamics models · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Empirically analyzes training dynamics of a learned optimizer (LSTM-based L2O) on MNIST MLPs, examining symmetry-breaking deviations, heavy-tailedness of updates, and update covariance versus SGD, Adam, and Lion.

Problem

Learned optimizers can speed up training, but their optimization dynamics are poorly understood, including how they relate to geometric constraints from network symmetries and to noise in parameter updates.

Approach

Examines learned optimizer trajectories through the lens of rescale/scale symmetry-induced gradient constraints, heavy-tailed noise (alpha-stable tail index), and update covariance, and tests a regularizer that penalizes deviation from these constraints.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use L2O instead of SGD or AdamMNIST optimizees with Leaky ReLU · MNISTupdate noise tail heavinessHelped
Use L2O instead of baseline optimizersMNIST optimizees with Leaky ReLU · MNISTupdate variationMixed
Add regularization penalizing update deviations from geometric constraints (ablation)L2O · MNIST optimizees with Leaky ReLU or batch normalizationoptimization speedHurt
Add symmetry-breaking regularization (ablation)L2O on optimizee architectures it was not meta-trained on · MNIST optimizeesoptimization speedHurt
Allow rapid symmetry breaking rather than regularizing updates toward geometric constraints (ablation)L2O · Initial phase of MNIST optimizationoptimization performanceHelped
Use L2O updates instead of gradientsL2O · Leaky ReLU optimizee on MNISTnoise tail heavinessHelped
Use L2O instead of baseline optimizersLeaky ReLU optimizee on MNIST · MNISTmaximum eigenvalue of update covarianceMixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MNIST

Benchmarks: MNIST

Metrics: absolute symmetry deviation training loss tail index alpha largest eigenvalue of update covariance

Baselines: SGD Adam Lion

Builds on: Andrychowicz et al. 2016 learned optimizer Kunin et al. 2021 symmetry geometry Simsekli et al. 2019 heavy-tailed SGD noise

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy