atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Prediction and decision losses

Integrated Decision Gradients: Compute Your Attributions Where the Model Makes Its Decision

AAAI 2024 · Learning theory and algorithms › Prediction and decision losses · approach: Provable post-hoc explanations · 16 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Integrated Decision Gradients (IDG), a path-integral attribution method that weights each gradient by the path derivative of the output logit so that the decision region dominates, plus an adaptive sampling scheme for non-uniform Riemann steps.

Problem

Integrated Gradients suffers from the saturation effect: gradients from path regions where the output logit barely changes dominate and produce noisy, poor attributions for image classifiers.

Approach

Scale each path gradient by the importance factor dF/dalpha (derivative of output with respect to path position), so gradients in the decision region are amplified and saturated ones suppressed; combine with adaptive non-uniform sampling placed where the logit grows.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
replace the strongest baseline with IDGImageNet attribution methods, three models · ImageNet val, R101/R152/RNXTAIC: 0.675 -> 0.701; 0.686 -> 0.718; 0.654 -> 0.730Helped
replace the strongest baseline with IDGImageNet attribution methods, three models · ImageNet val, R101/R152/RNXTSIC: 0.609 -> 0.638; 0.619 -> 0.659; 0.554 -> 0.620Helped
replace the strongest baseline with IDGImageNet attribution methods, three models · ImageNet val, R101/R152/RNXTInsertion: 0.561 -> 0.592; 0.577 -> 0.615; 0.307 -> 0.324Helped
replace the strongest baseline with IDGImageNet attribution methods, three models · ImageNet val, R101/R152/RNXTDeletion: 0.148 -> 0.108; 0.148 -> 0.118; 0.078 -> 0.068Helped
add adaptive sampling to IG (ablation)IG, ImageNet ResNet101 · ImageNet, ResNet101Insertion: 0.513 -> 0.532Helped
add adaptive sampling to IDG (ablation)IDG, ImageNet ResNet101 · ImageNet, ResNet101Insertion: 0.546 -> 0.586Helped
add adaptive sampling to IG (ablation)IG, ImageNet ResNet101 · ImageNet, ResNet101Deletion: 0.167 -> 0.146Helped
add adaptive sampling to IDG (ablation)IDG, ImageNet ResNet101 · ImageNet, ResNet101Deletion: 0.135 -> 0.110Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ImageNet

Benchmarks: ImageNet

Metrics: AIC AUC SIC AUC RISE insertion AUC RISE deletion AUC

Baselines: IG Left-IG Guided IG AGI

Builds on: Integrated Gradients Left-IG Guided IG Adversarial Gradient Integration RISE XRAI

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy