atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Backdoor and poisoning

Inspecting Prediction Confidence for Detecting Black-Box Backdoor Attacks

AAAI 2024 · Adversarial robustness and security › Backdoor and poisoning · approach: Training-time backdoor defense · 10 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes DTInspector, a black-box backdoor detector that exploits the observation that backdoor attacks give poisoned data higher prediction confidence, then learns a mask patch on high-confidence samples and checks its transfer ratio on low-confidence samples for anomaly detection.

Problem

Detecting whether a trained deep learning model has been backdoored by a black-box attack, including frequency-domain attacks that bypass existing model-inspection defenses such as Neural Cleanse, ABS, ULP and MNTD.

Approach

Black-box backdoor attacks need high prediction confidence on poisoned training samples to achieve high ASR; DTInspector learns a patch on high-confidence samples of each label and uses the transfer ratio of low-confidence samples (low for infected labels because the patch destroys the shortcut trigger) with MAD anomaly detection.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use confidence-based patch learning and transfer-ratio anomaly detectionDTINSPECTOR on partial, MTOT, and MTMT attacks · Advanced backdoor attacksmodel detection: 16.19; 36.74; 62.72Helped
use DTINSPECTOR instead of ULP or MNTDBADNET on CIFAR10 with unseen triggers · Unseen triggerstrojan detection: 122.00; 39.23Helped
use distribution transfer rather than directly comparing confidence distributionsBackdoor model detection · Six attacks and three advanced attack typesdetection accuracy: BADNET: 6.95 vs 199.65; TROJANNN: 1.88 vs 4.47; CL: 6.95 vs 77.34; SIG: 2.82 vs 7.86; REFOOL: 13.47 vs 6.34; FTROJAN: 5.Helped
remove suspected training samples using the learned patch, then retrainDTINSPECTOR on BADNET, TROJANNN, CL, SIG, REFOOL, partial, and MTOT attacks · Backdoor mitigationASR: 96.34 -> 7.66; 98.25 -> 14.25; 96.12 -> 8.93; 97.75 -> 0.02; 99.98 -> 0.11; 90.80 -> 1.90; 96.05 -> 9.23Helped
remove suspected training samples using the learned patch, then retrainDTINSPECTOR on MTMT attack · MTMT attackbenign accuracy (%): 84.26 -> 70.05Hurt
remove suspected training samples using the learned patch, then retrainDTINSPECTOR on MTMT attack · MTMT attackASR (%): 98.21 -> 7.06Helped
slightly increase the poisoning rate to achieve a highly effective attackBlack-box backdoor attacks · Poisoned versus clean training samplesprediction confidence: 0.92 -> 0.95Helped
increase poisoning rateBADNET · CIFAR10ASRHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR10 GTSRB PubFig ImageNet

Benchmarks: CIFAR10 GTSRB PubFig ImageNet

Metrics: anomaly index transfer ratio attack success rate benign accuracy detection accuracy

Baselines: Neural Cleanse ABS ULP MNTD STRIP data inspection

Builds on: Neural Cleanse universal adversarial perturbation STRIP

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy