atlas

Research map / Large language models / Retrieval and knowledge

Improving the Robustness of Knowledge-Grounded Dialogue via Contrastive Learning

AAAI 2024 · Large language models › Retrieval and knowledge · approach: Explanatory and multiple-choice QA benchmarks · 11 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes EnCo, an entity-guided contrastive learning framework that builds paraphrased positives and entity-perturbed negatives to make knowledge-grounded dialogue models robust to real-world noise.

Problem

Knowledge-grounded dialogue systems are hurt by real-world noise such as misspellings, abbreviations, incomplete, erroneous or outdated knowledge graph facts, and prior KGD work neglects robustness.

Approach

Entity-guided paraphrasing (entity boundary tokens keep entities unchanged) creates semantic-irrelevant positives, while entity-guided negative augmentation (delete/replace entities in both context and KG) creates semantic-relevant negatives; a contrastive loss on encoder representations plus cross-entropy on positives trains the model.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add entity-based contrastive learning and positive-sample augmentationBART-large KGD model · KdConv (music)BLEU-1: 36.88 -> 39.39Helped
add entity-based contrastive learning and positive-sample augmentationBART-large KGD model · KdConv (travel)BLEU-1: 45.00 -> 46.61Helped
add entity-based contrastive learning and positive-sample augmentationBART-large KGD model · KdConv (film)BLEU-1: 30.14 -> 31.43Helped
add entity-based contrastive learning and positive-sample augmentationBART-large KGD model · DuConvBLEU-1: 39.06 -> 40.10Helped
add entity-based contrastive learning and positive-sample augmentationBART-large KGD model · DuRecDialBLEU-1: 39.02 -> 40.05Helped
add positive-sample cross-entropy loss (ablation)EnCo · KdConv (music)BLEU-1: 36.59 -> 39.39Helped
add positive-sample cross-entropy loss (ablation)EnCo · KdConv (travel)BLEU-1: 43.29 -> 46.61Helped
add contrastive loss (ablation)EnCo · KdConv (music)BLEU-1: 36.02 -> 39.39Helped
add contrastive loss (ablation)EnCo · KdConv (travel)BLEU-1: 42.80 -> 46.61Helped
train with entity-guided contrastive learning and augmentationEnCo · DuConv with noisy inputsBLEU-1Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: KdConv DuConv DuRecDial ParaZh-22M

Benchmarks: KdConv DuConv DuRecDial

Metrics: PPL BLEU-1/2/3/4 DISTINCT-1/2/3/4 human fluency/coherence/informativeness

Baselines: Seq2Seq HRED Seq2Seq+Know. HRED+Know. KIC SDAN MGCG_G KSPN BART BART+Know KRP-DS

Builds on: BART TransR contrastive learning ParaZh-22M

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy