Research map / Optimization / Nonconvex and smooth optimization
An Online Method for A Class of Distributionally Robust Optimization with Non-convex Objectives
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Optimize DRO with RECOVER instead of ERM with SGD | ResNet-20 · STL10, IMRATIO 0.02 | test accuracy (%): 37.97 (0.78) -> 38.08 (0.59) | Helped |
| Optimize DRO with RECOVER instead of ERM with SGD | ResNet-20 · STL10, IMRATIO 0.05 | test accuracy (%): 41.12 (0.94) -> 42.68 (0.60) | Helped |
| Optimize DRO with RECOVER instead of ERM with SGD | ResNet-20 · STL10, IMRATIO 0.1 | test accuracy (%): 46.03 (0.96) -> 48.94 (0.86) | Helped |
| Optimize DRO with RECOVER instead of ERM with SGD | ResNet-20 · STL10, IMRATIO 0.2 | test accuracy (%): 51.75 (1.14) -> 56.06 (1.26) | Helped |
| Optimize DRO with RECOVER instead of ERM with SGD | ResNet-20 · CIFAR10, IMRATIO 0.02 | test accuracy (%): 65.36(0.64) -> 66.14 (0.48) | Helped |
| Optimize DRO with RECOVER instead of ERM with SGD | ResNet-20 · CIFAR10, IMRATIO 0.05 | test accuracy (%): 74.74 (0.71) -> 75.90 (0.33) | Helped |
| Optimize DRO with RECOVER instead of ERM with SGD | ResNet-20 · CIFAR10, IMRATIO 0.1 | test accuracy (%): 79.32 (0.42) -> 80.93 (0.31) | Helped |
| Optimize DRO with RECOVER instead of ERM with SGD | ResNet-20 · CIFAR10, IMRATIO 0.2 | test accuracy (%): 84.84 (0.51) -> 85.93 (0.14) | Helped |
| Optimize DRO with RECOVER instead of ERM with SGD | ResNet-20 · CIFAR100, IMRATIO 0.02 | test accuracy (%): 38.99 (0.62) -> 39.45 (0.56) | Helped |
| Optimize DRO with RECOVER instead of ERM with SGD | ResNet-20 · CIFAR100, IMRATIO 0.05 | test accuracy (%): 45.79 (0.69) -> 44.47 (0.66) | Hurt |
| Optimize DRO with RECOVER instead of ERM with SGD | ResNet-20 · CIFAR100, IMRATIO 0.1 | test accuracy (%): 49.45 (0.5) -> 50.84 (0.86) | Helped |
| Optimize DRO with RECOVER instead of ERM with SGD | ResNet-20 · CIFAR100, IMRATIO 0.2 | test accuracy (%): 55.80 (0.74) -> 56.90 (0.42) | Helped |
Closest papers by meaning
- Revisiting Large-Scale Non-convex Distributionally Robust Optimization (ICLR 2025 · similarity 0.93)
- Large-Scale Non-convex Stochastic Constrained Distributionally Robust Optimization (AAAI 2024 · similarity 0.91)
- Drago: Primal-Dual Coupled Variance Reduction for Faster Distributionally Robust Optimization (NeurIPS 2024 · similarity 0.90)
- Distributionally Robust Optimization with Bias and Variance Reduction (ICLR 2024 · similarity 0.90)
- Outlier-Robust Distributionally Robust Optimization via Unbalanced Optimal Transport (NeurIPS 2024 · similarity 0.88)
- Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization through the Lens of Structural Causal Models and Individual Fairness (NeurIPS 2024 · similarity 0.88)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.