atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Noisy labels

Improved Regularization and Robustness for Fine-tuning in Neural Networks

NeurIPS 2021 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Noisy labels · approach: Loss correction and noise robustness theory · 11 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
layer-wise regularization plus self-labeling (REGSL) vs L2-PGMResNet-101 fine-tuning · Stanford-Dogstop-1 accuracy (%): 86.48±0.28 -> 89.58±0.13Helped
REGSL vs vanilla fine-tuningResNet-101 · Aircraftstop-1 accuracy (%): 73.96±0.34 -> 75.32±0.23Helped
REGSL vs L2-SP on Stanford-Cars-like tasksResNet-101 · Stanford-Carstop-1 accuracy (%): 89.28±0.14 -> 89.14±0.22No clear effect
REGSL vs ELR under label noiseResNet-18 on Indoor · Indoor 80% independent noisetop-1 accuracy (%): 31.24±0.19 -> 34.08±0.79Helped
REGSL vs L2-PGM under label noiseResNet-18 on Indoor · Indoor 20% independent noisetop-1 accuracy (%): 69.45±0.19 -> 72.51±0.46Helped
REGSL vs L2-PGM on few-shotResNet-12 · miniImageNet 5-way-5-shotaccuracy (%): 77.33 ± 0.59 -> 78.03 ± 0.54Helped
remove any one component (layer-wise reg, label correction, reweighting) (ablation)REGSL · Indoor label noiseaccuracyHelped

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy