atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / CNN design

Rethinking the Pruning Criteria for Convolutional Neural Network

NeurIPS 2021 · Architectures and efficiency › CNN design · approach: CNN filter pruning · 26 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
choose filters with l1 vs l2 vs Fermat vs GM criteria (layer-wise)ResNet56 · CIFAR10/100pruned/finetuned accuracyNo clear effect
use l1 vs l2 criterion in global pruningVGG16 · ImageNet-style pruning similaritySpearman rank correlationMixed
randomly prune among filters with near-identical l2 scoresVGG16 · CIFAR100accuracy gap max-min: 1.24Hurt
randomly prune among filters with near-identical l2 scores (20%)VGG19 · CIFAR100accuracy gap max-min: 1.91Hurt
increase number of filters in second conv layer from 64 to 256 (ablation)VGG16 · CIFAR10Spearman rank correlationHelped

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy