atlas

Research map / Graph learning / GNN architectures

HAGO-Net: Hierarchical Geometric Message Passing for Molecular Representation Learning

AAAI 2024 · Graph learning › GNN architectures · approach: Equivariant networks for molecules · 8 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes HAGO-Graph, a hierarchical n-body geometric graph with a chirality-aware ROT feature, and HAGO-Net/DHAGO-Net message passing models for invariant molecular property prediction and equivariant force prediction.

Problem

Completely and effectively characterizing and learning 3D molecular geometry for molecular property prediction, chirality identification, and molecular dynamics (force) prediction.

Approach

Model molecular geometry hierarchically as n-body nodes (atoms, pairs, triplets, etc.) with intra-n-body geometry as node attributes and inter-n-body geometry as edge attributes, connected by horizontal and vertical edges; a message passing scheme (HAGO-MPS) aggregates across and within scales. A new chiral identity, the relative orientation of tetrahedron (ROT), distinguishes enantiomers; the der

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use HAGO-Net for QM9 molecular property predictionQM9 property prediction · QM9MAEMixed
Use HAGO-Net for QM9 U0 predictionQM9 property prediction · QM9MAE U0: 5.89 vs 6.59Helped
Use HAGO-Net for QM9 U predictionQM9 property prediction · QM9MAE U: 6.11 vs 6.36Helped
Use HAGO-Net for QM9 G predictionQM9 property prediction · QM9MAE G: 7.30 vs 7.78Helped
Use HAGO-Net for QM9 µ predictionQM9 property prediction · QM9MAE µ: 0.023 vs 0.011Hurt
Use HAGO-Net for QM9 ϵHOMO predictionQM9 property prediction · QM9MAE ϵHOMO: 22.6 vs 15.0Hurt
Use HAGO-Net for QM9 ϵLUMO predictionQM9 property prediction · QM9MAE ϵLUMO: 19.1 vs 14.0Hurt
Use DHAGO-Net for force predictionMD17 molecular dynamics prediction · MD17 aspirinforce MAE: 11.6 vs 14.7Helped
Use DHAGO-Net for force predictionMD17 molecular dynamics prediction · MD17 ethanolforce MAE: 5.9 vs 9.0Helped
Use DHAGO-Net for force predictionMD17 molecular dynamics prediction · MD17 malonaldehydeforce MAE: 9.7 vs 13.8Helped
Use DHAGO-Net for force predictionMD17 molecular dynamics prediction · MD17 naphthaleneforce MAE: 5.8 vs 3.4Hurt
Use DHAGO-Net for force predictionMD17 molecular dynamics prediction · MD17 salicylic acidforce MAE: 8.7 vs 8.5Hurt

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: QM9 MD17 GEOM-QM9 PubChem3D

Benchmarks: GEOM-QM9 PubChem3D QM9 MD17

Metrics: accuracy MAE

Baselines: SchNet sGDML PhysNet DimeNet SEGNN PaiNN ComENet SphereNet TorchMD Equiformer ChIRo NequIP

Builds on: DimeNet SphereNet Equiformer Weisfeiler-Lehman test

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy