atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Certified and empirical robustness

Robustness of Bayesian Neural Networks to Gradient-Based Attacks

NeurIPS 2020 · Adversarial robustness and security › Certified and empirical robustness · approach: Provable robust learning guarantees · 27 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use gradient-based attack (FGSM/PGD) instead of random sign attackBNN (HMC, VI) · MNIST and Fashion MNISTadversarial accuracy: 0.850 -> 0.960 (MNIST HMC FGSM)No clear effect
increase number of posterior samples averaged in the expected gradient (ablation)HMC and VI BNN · MNIST and Fashion MNISTmagnitude of expected loss gradientHelped
train BNN with HMC instead of SGD deterministic trainingMNIST/Fashion MNIST networks · accuracy-robustness trade-off under FGSMrobustness vs accuracyHelped
use VI instead of HMC for BNN posteriorBNN · MNIST and Fashion MNISTrobustness vs accuracyHurt
increase network width (neurons) (ablation)HMC BNN · MNIST and Fashion MNISTrobustness to FGSMHelped
increase network width (ablation)VI BNN · MNISTrobustness to FGSMMixed

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy