atlas

Research map / Federated learning and privacy / Personalized and heterogeneous FL

Formal Logic Enabled Personalized Federated Learning through Property Inference

AAAI 2024 · Federated learning and privacy › Personalized and heterogeneous FL · approach: Sparse and collaboration-graph personalization · 5 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes FedSTL, a personalized federated learning framework that automatically mines signal temporal logic properties per client, uses them as loss regularizers, and clusters clients by property alignment.

Problem

Federated learning with heterogeneous clients struggles to give symbolic reasoning guarantees: client predictions miss device-specific temporal logic properties, leading to suboptimal performance in AIoT settings like traffic prediction.

Approach

Automatically infer STL properties from each client's local data via specification mining with robustness-based tight bounds, enforce them through a property loss and a teacher-student correction, and cluster clients by how well cluster models satisfy their properties, with bi-level (shared cluster layers plus private client heads) updates.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add inferred client logic properties and property-based prediction correctionFedSTL with RNN · Highway traffic volume, 15 statesMSE: .107$\pm$.032 -> .076$\pm$.022Helped
add inferred client logic properties and property-based prediction correctionFedSTL with GRU · Highway traffic volume, 15 statesMSE: .134$\pm$.033 -> .118$\pm$.027Helped
add inferred client logic properties and property-based prediction correctionFedSTL with LSTM · Highway traffic volume, 15 statesMSE: .110$\pm$.035 -> .099$\pm$.026Helped
add inferred client logic properties and property-based prediction correctionFedSTL with Transformer · Highway traffic volume, 15 statesMSE: .061$\pm$.004 -> .287$\pm$.013Hurt
add inferred client logic properties and prediction correctionFedSTL with RNN · Highway traffic volume, 15 statessatisfaction rate: 80.04$\pm$1.00 -> \textbf{100.0$\pm$0.00}Helped
add inferred client logic properties and prediction correctionFedSTL with GRU · Highway traffic volume, 15 statessatisfaction rate: 80.51$\pm$0.75 -> \textbf{100.0$\pm$0.00}Helped
add inferred client logic properties and prediction correctionFedSTL with LSTM · Highway traffic volume, 15 statessatisfaction rate: 81.93$\pm$0.89 -> \textbf{100.0$\pm$0.00}Helped
add inferred client logic properties and prediction correctionFedSTL with Transformer · Highway traffic volume, 15 statessatisfaction rate: 78.05$\pm$0.63 -> \textbf{100.0$\pm$0.00}Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: U.S. Traffic Volume Data Tabulations (FHWA, 2019, 15 states) SUMO simulated Nashville, TN road traffic and pollution data (100 clients)

Benchmarks: U.S. Traffic Volume Data Tabulations SUMO smart city multivariate simulation

Metrics: MSE property satisfaction rate (rho %)

Baselines: FedAvg FedProx FedRep Ditto IFCA

Builds on: FedAvg IFCA Ditto FedRep FedProx

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy