Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Knowledge distillation
Fine-Grained Distillation for Long Document Retrieval
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Proposes fine-grained distillation (FGD) that distills passage- and sentence-level relevance from a cross-encoder into a single-vector long-document bi-encoder using global-consistent granularity embeddings, reaching SOTA on MS-MARCO Doc and TREC 2019 Doc.
Problem
Knowledge distillation from cross-encoders to bi-encoders is less effective for long document retrieval because documents cover multiple topics, causing a granularity mismatch between query-dependent cross-encoder scores and query-agnostic document-level bi-encoder vectors.
Approach
Produce single-vector-consistent embeddings for passages and sentences via global [CLS] attention pooling, distill multi-granular score distributions from a cross-encoder at fine granularity only during training, and mine hierarchical hard negatives across granularities; inference remains single-vector.
Key results
- FGD achieves 0.440 MRR@100 on MS-MARCO doc dev, versus 0.422 for the previous SoTA COSTA.
- FGD reaches 0.635 nDCG@10 and 0.349 Recall@100 on TREC 2019 Doc, the best reported in Table 1.
- Multi-vector retrieval (FGD + multi) raises MRR@100 to 0.444 on MS-MARCO dev.
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| add fine-grained distillation at passage level (ablation) | FGD · MS-Marco Doc Dev | MRR@100: 0.435 -> 0.440 | Helped |
| add fine-grained distillation at sentence level (ablation) | FGD · MS-Marco Doc Dev | MRR@100: 0.435 -> 0.440 | Helped |
| add document-level distillation (ablation) | FGD · MS-Marco Doc Dev | MRR@100: 0.440 -> 0.436 | Hurt |
| replace global-consistent embedding with fine-grained mean pooling (ablation) | FGD · MS-Marco Doc Dev | MRR@100: 0.440 -> 0.426 | Hurt |
| use mean pooling for all granularity embeddings (ablation) | FGD · MS-Marco Doc Dev | MRR@100: 0.440 -> 0.425 | Hurt |
| separate text pieces instead of using contextualized fine-grained representations (ablation) | FGD · MS-Marco Doc Dev | MRR@100: 0.440 -> 0.429 | Hurt |
| remove fine-grained distillation and use only document-level distillation (ablation) | FGD · MS-Marco Doc Dev | MRR@100: 0.428 -> 0.440 | Hurt |
| remove all distillation (ablation) | FGD · MS-Marco Doc Dev | MRR@100: 0.427 -> 0.440 | Hurt |
| add multi-vector retrieval (ablation) | FGD · MS-Marco Doc Dev | MRR@100: 0.440 -> 0.444 | Helped |
| replace global-consistent embedding with RGAT propagation (ablation) | FGD · MS-Marco Doc Dev | MRR@100: 0.440 -> 0.441 | No clear effect |
Surprising findings
- Brute-force document-level distillation yields only about 0.1% gain on long document retrieval after extensive tuning, versus over 1% in passage retrieval.
- Adding document-level distillation to FGD lowers MRR@100 by 0.4%, which the authors attribute to granularity mismatch.
Limitations
- Gain over strong pretrained baselines is modest on TREC 2019 and the multi-vector variant departs from pure single-vector retrieval.
- Fine-grained distillation relies on weak labels, since sub-document positives are assumed to be all passages/sentences in the gold document.
Experimental setup
Datasets: MS-MARCO document retrieval MS-MARCO passage retrieval
Benchmarks: MS-MARCO document dev TREC 2019 Deep Learning document
Metrics: MRR@100 Recall@100 nDCG@10
Baselines: BM25 DeepCT ANCE BERT (Ma et al. 2022) STAR ICT PROP B-PROP SEED RepCONC JPQ ADORE+STAR
Builds on: ED-MLM / SimLM coCondenser STAR ADORE COSTA
Closest papers by meaning
- Hierarchical Retrieval: The Geometry and a Pretrain-Finetune Recipe (NeurIPS 2025 · similarity 0.86)
- Benchmarking and Building Long-Context Retrieval Models with LoCo and M2-BERT (ICML 2024 · similarity 0.85)
- Composed Image Retrieval with Text Feedback via Multi-grained Uncertainty Regularization (ICLR 2024 · similarity 0.85)
- Task-level Distributionally Robust Optimization for Large Language Model-based Dense Retrieval (AAAI 2025 · similarity 0.84)
- NUDGE: Lightweight Non-Parametric Fine-Tuning of Embeddings for Retrieval (ICLR 2025 · similarity 0.84)
- Distribution-Driven Dense Retrieval: Modeling Many-to-One Query-Document Relationship (AAAI 2025 · similarity 0.84)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
