atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / Pruning and efficient tuning

Find the Lady: Permutation and Re-synchronization of Deep Neural Networks

AAAI 2024 · Architectures and efficiency › Pruning and efficient tuning · approach: Low-rank compression and merging · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a cosine-similarity-based method to re-synchronize (undo) neuron permutations in deep networks, robust to noise, fine-tuning, quantization and pruning, and shows an integrity threat to white-box watermarking.

Problem

Neuron order in a layer can be arbitrarily permuted without changing model output, which breaks white-box watermark extraction and integrity checks; the question is whether the original order can be recovered when the permutation is unknown and the weights are further perturbed.

Approach

Match each permuted neuron to its original position by the cosine similarity of its weight vector with the original layer's weights; because neurons with similar outputs have de-correlated weights, the argmax similarity recovers the permutation, and it stays robust under perturbations. The authors also show that scaling-type perturbations keep cosine similarity at one while changing the function,

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add Gaussian noise with Ω=10Cosine-similarity re-synchronization on VGG-16 · CIFAR-10re-synchronization success rate: 100 -> 93.50Hurt
Add Gaussian noise with Ω=10Cosine-similarity re-synchronization on YOLO-v5n · COCOre-synchronization success rate: 100 -> 5.49Hurt
Fine-tune the model with Θ=10Cosine-similarity re-synchronization · CIFAR-10 (VGG-16) and ImageNet-1k (ResNet50)re-synchronization success rate: 100 -> 100No clear effect
Quantize to B=2Cosine-similarity re-synchronization on VGG-16 · CIFAR-10re-synchronization success rate: 100 -> 100No clear effect
Quantize to B=2Cosine-similarity re-synchronization on ResNet50 · ImageNet-1kre-synchronization success rate: 100 -> 31.54Hurt
Prune 99% of weights by magnitudeCosine-similarity re-synchronization on VGG-16 · CIFAR-10re-synchronization success rate: 100 -> 99.90No clear effect
Prune 99% of weights by magnitudeCosine-similarity re-synchronization on YOLO-v5n · COCOre-synchronization success rate: 100 -> 25.88Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR-10 ImageNet-1k Cityscapes COCO UVG

Benchmarks: CIFAR-10 ImageNet-1k Cityscapes COCO UVG

Metrics: re-synchronization success rate (Psi) top-1 classification error mean IoU complement mAP50 complement bpp at MS-SSIM 0.97

Baselines: L1-norm ranking trigger set neuron identification Uchida et al. white-box watermarking

Builds on: Uchida et al. white-box watermarking

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy