atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

Time Matters in Regularizing Deep Networks: Weight Decay and Data Augmentation Affect Early Learning Dynamics, Matter Little Near Convergence

NeurIPS 2019 · Architectures and efficiency › RNNs and normalization · approach: Representation geometry and collapse · 54 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
apply weight decay only during first ~100 epochs instead of throughout (ablation)ResNet-18 / All-CNN training · CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100test accuracy: around 5% test errorNo clear effect
remove weight decay shortly after critical period (e.g. epoch 75, All-CNN, no BN) (ablation)All-CNN · CIFAR-10test accuracyHelped
delay weight decay onset to epoch 50 (ablation)ResNet-18 · CIFAR-10test error: 5% -> 7%Hurt
apply regularization only late in training (after critical period) (ablation)ResNet-18 / All-CNN · CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100test accuracyNo clear effect
50-epoch weight decay window starting at epoch 0 vs epoch 50 (ablation)ResNet-18 · CIFAR-10mean test accuracy increase: 0.24% -> 1.92%Helped
remove batch normalization (ablation)critical-period regularization experiments · CIFAR-10critical period effectNo clear effect
switch to piecewise constant learning rate schedule (ablation)critical-period experiments · CIFAR-10critical period effectNo clear effect

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy