atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Treatment effects

Exploiting Geometry for Treatment Effect Estimation via Optimal Transport

AAAI 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Treatment effects · approach: Meta-learners and partial identification · 3 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes OTCI, a semi-relaxed fused Gromov-Wasserstein optimal transport model with entropic marginal regularization that learns control-sample weights for ATT estimation, solved with projected mirror descent.

Problem

Estimating average treatment effect on the treated from observational data under confounding bias caused by imbalanced confounder distributions; existing re-weighting relies on propensity models or low-order moment alignment that is sensitive to outliers.

Approach

Connects ATT estimation error to the Kantorovich optimal transport problem and learns control weights by combining inter-group Wasserstein cost with intra-group Gromov-Wasserstein metric consistency, plus a negative entropic regularizer on the marginal, optimized by projected mirror descent with KL geometry.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use OTCI instead of OTWATT estimation · LaLondeMAE: 289.689±198.828 -> 192.364±120.783Helped
Use OTCI instead of ARBATT estimation · TwinsMAE: .005±.004 -> .003±.002Helped
Add inter-group geometry to moment-based Ebal(1)OTCI on the toy example · Toy exampleMAE: .473 -> .407Helped
Add intra-group geometry to moment-based Ebal(1)OTCI on the toy example · Toy exampleMAE: .473 -> .355Helped
Add inter-group geometry to the method using only intra-group geometry (ablation)OTCI on the toy example · Toy exampleMAE: .355 -> .347Helped
Add intra-group geometry to the method using only inter-group geometry (ablation)OTCI on the toy example · Toy exampleMAE: .407 -> .347Helped
Use only inter-group geometry instead of both inter- and intra-group geometry (ablation)OTCI · Toy exampleMAE: .347 -> .407Hurt
Use only intra-group geometry instead of both inter- and intra-group geometry (ablation)OTCI · Toy exampleMAE: .347 -> .355Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: LaLonde (NSW/CPS) Twins synthetic Gaussian and non-Gaussian simulations 2D toy example with outliers

Benchmarks: LaLonde Twins simulation data (Gaussian, non-Gaussian) toy example with outliers

Metrics: MAE of ATT

Baselines: IPW DR CBPS ARB Ebal DCB BART CFR OTW causalOT

Builds on: Kantorovich optimal transport fused Gromov-Wasserstein entropy balancing differentiated confounder balancing causal optimal transport

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy