atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Knowledge and temporal graphs

Dual-Channel Learning Framework for Drug-Drug Interaction Prediction via Relation-Aware Heterogeneous Graph Transformer

AAAI 2024 · Graph learning › Knowledge and temporal graphs · approach: Social and behavior graphs · 50 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes TIGER, a dual-channel relation-aware heterogeneous graph Transformer that fuses graph-level embeddings from drug molecular graphs with node-level embeddings from subgraphs of biomedical knowledge graphs to predict DDIs.

Problem

Drug-drug interaction prediction is limited by GNN local-neighborhood aggregation (over-squashing, weak long-range modeling) and by difficulty integrating heterogeneous information from biomedical knowledge graphs and drug molecular graphs.

Approach

A Transformer with relation-aware self-attention that treats each typed relation between node pairs as a distinct edge and adds shortest-path distance relations for distant nodes, applied to both molecular graphs (graph-level) and sampled knowledge-graph subgraphs (node-level), with a mutual-information regularizer.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Combine the molecular graph and biomedical knowledge graph channels (ablation)TIGER · DrugBankACC: 0.6347 -> 0.7903; 0.7126 -> 0.7903Helped
Combine the molecular graph and biomedical knowledge graph channels (ablation)TIGER · KEGGACC: 0.7716 -> 0.8752; 0.8593 -> 0.8752Helped
Combine the molecular graph and biomedical knowledge graph channels (ablation)TIGER · OGB-biokgACC: 0.7987 -> 0.8548; 0.8476 -> 0.8548Helped
Use TIGER instead of MDNNDrugBank DDI prediction · DrugBankACC: 0.7394 -> 0.7905Helped
Use TIGER instead of Bi-GNNKEGG DDI prediction · KEGGACC: 0.8503 -> 0.8850Helped
Use TIGER instead of MIRACLEOGB-biokg DDI prediction · OGB-biokgACC: 0.8923 -> 0.9162Helped
Use the probability-based subgraph extractor rather than the DeepWalk-based extractor (ablation)TIGER · DrugBankACC: 0.7849 -> 0.7905No clear effect
Use the DeepWalk-based subgraph extractor rather than the probability-based extractor (ablation)TIGER · OGB-biokgACC: 0.8791 -> 0.9162Helped
Use the k-subtree-based extractor rather than the strongest alternate extractor (ablation)TIGER · DrugBank, KEGG, and OGB-biokgACCMixed
Set k to 2 in the k-subtree extractor (ablation)TIGER · DrugBankACCHelped
Increase k beyond 4 in the k-subtree extractor (ablation)TIGER · DrugBankACCHurt
Increase the number of transformer layers L while fixing k=2 (ablation)TIGER · DrugBankACCNo clear effect

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: DrugBank KEGG OGB-biokg

Benchmarks: DrugBank KEGG OGB-biokg

Metrics: ACC F1 AUC AUPR

Baselines: SSI-DDI Molormer KGNN KG2ECapsule DDKG Bi-GNN MIRACLE MDNN

Builds on: Transformer Graphormer Deep Graph Infomax-style JS mutual information estimator DeepWalk PageRank

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy