atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Noisy labels

Dual Self-Paced Cross-Modal Hashing

AAAI 2024 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Noisy labels · approach: Crowdsourced label aggregation · 28 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes DSCMH, a cross-modal hashing method that applies self-paced learning at both instance and feature levels to learn robust hash codes from easy to hard samples.

Problem

Cross-modal hashing methods treat all instances and features equally, making them vulnerable to noise and outliers in multimodal data.

Approach

Assigns learnable reliability weights to each instance and each feature via a self-paced regularizer, gradually increasing the weights during training so the model learns from easy to hard in both levels, combined with cross-space consensus learning between latent space and Hamming codes.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use DSCMH instead of AMSHCross-modal hashing · MIRFlickr, I → T, 64 bitsmAP (%): 76.96 -> 78.76Helped
Use DSCMH instead of AMSHCross-modal hashing · IAPR-TC12, I → T, 64 bitsmAP (%): 53.66 -> 56.75Helped
Use DSCMH instead of FDDHCross-modal hashing · NUS-WIDE, I → T, 64 bitsmAP (%): 68.60 -> 69.26Helped
Use DSCMH instead of AMSHCross-modal hashing · MIRFlickr, T → I, 64 bitsmAP (%): 83.07 -> 83.59Helped
Use DSCMH instead of AMSHCross-modal hashing · IAPR-TC12, T → I, 64 bitsmAP (%): 66.32 -> 67.21Helped
Use DSCMH instead of FDDHCross-modal hashing · NUS-WIDE, T → I, 64 bitsmAP (%): 81.58 -> 80.99Hurt
Use DSCMH instead of FDDHCross-modal hashing · MIRFlickr with noise, I → T, 64 bitsmAP (%): 63.75 -> 66.76Helped
Use DSCMH instead of AMSHCross-modal hashing · MIRFlickr with noise, T → I, 64 bitsmAP (%): 82.34 -> 82.90Helped
Replace consensus latent representations with specific-view latent representations (ablation)DSCMH · MIRFlickr, I → T, 64 bitsmAP (%): 78.76 -> 78.24Hurt
Replace consensus latent representations with specific-view latent representations (ablation)DSCMH · MIRFlickr, T → I, 64 bitsmAP (%): 83.59 -> 82.34Hurt
Add dual self-paced learning (ablation)DSCMH · MIRFlickr, I → T, 64 bitsmAP (%): 76.14 -> 78.76Helped
Add dual self-paced learning (ablation)DSCMH · MIRFlickr, T → I, 64 bitsmAP (%): 81.86 -> 83.59Helped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MIRFlickr IAPR-TC12 NUS-WIDE

Benchmarks: MIRFlickr IAPR-TC12 NUS-WIDE

Metrics: mAP precision-recall curve training time

Baselines: RFDH LCMFH DLFH MTFH FCMH FDDH BATCH EDMH DAH ALECH WASH AMSH

Builds on: self-paced learning LCMFH AMSH

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy