AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Fairness

On preserving non-discrimination when combining expert advice

NeurIPS 2018 · Learning theory and algorithms › Fairness · approach: Minimax fairness via sampling · 17 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use separate multiplicative weights instances for each group instead of one shared instanceOnline expert advice with individually equalized-error-rate-fair experts · Equalized error ratesfairness gap: α-fairnessHelped
Use separate multiplicative weights instances for each groupOnline expert advice · Equalized error ratesε-approximate regret: O(|G| log(d)/ε)Helped
Combine groups with a single group-unaware algorithmOnline expert advice with individually fair experts · Equalized error ratesfairness gap: α-unfair for any α>0Hurt
Use group-unaware no-regret learningOnline expert advice with individually equalized-odds-fair predictors · False negative ratefairness gap: 3/8Hurt
Use group-aware no-regret learningOnline expert advice with individually equalized-odds-fair predictors · False negative ratefairness gap: (0.49-0.99b)/(1-b)Hurt
Use shifting-regret algorithms, even when run separately for each groupOnline expert advice · Equalized error ratesfairness gap: α-unfair for any α<1/2Hurt

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy