atlas

Research map / Image generation / Autoregressive and latent generation

DiffusionEdge: Diffusion Probabilistic Model for Crisp Edge Detection

AAAI 2024 · Image generation › Autoregressive and latent generation · approach: Reconstruction-based diffusion image detection · 70 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes DiffusionEdge, the first diffusion probabilistic model for general edge detection, running a decoupled DDM in autoencoder latent space with an adaptive FFT filter and a distilled uncertainty-aware cross-entropy loss to produce crisp edge maps without NMS post-processing.

Problem

Learning-based edge detectors struggle to produce edge maps that are both correct (accurate edge/non-edge labels) and crisp (thin, single-pixel-width edges) without heavy post-processing such as NMS, and diffusion models are costly to run in pixel space.

Approach

Apply a decoupled diffusion model in autoencoder latent space, add a learnable adaptive FFT filter to the denoising U-Net, and train with an uncertainty-aware weighted BCE loss passed to the latent code by skipping the autoencoder gradient (uncertainty distillation) so the diffusion output is crisp directly.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add Uncertainty Distillation without Adaptive FFT-filter (ablation)DiffusionEdge · BSDSODS: 0.816 -> 0.831Helped
add Adaptive FFT-filter without Uncertainty Distillation (ablation)DiffusionEdge · BSDSODS: 0.816 -> 0.825Helped
add Adaptive FFT-filter when Uncertainty Distillation is present (ablation)DiffusionEdge with UD · BSDSODS: 0.831 -> 0.834Helped
add Adaptive FFT-filter without Uncertainty Distillation (ablation)DiffusionEdge · BSDSAC: 0.521 -> 0.461Hurt
use Swin instead of ResNet as image encoder (ablation)DiffusionEdge · BSDSODS: 0.823 -> 0.834Helped
vary sampling steps from 1 to 50 (ablation)DiffusionEdge with Swin · BSDSODS: 0.833; 0.835; 0.834; 0.834; 0.833; 0.833No clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: BSDS500 NYUDv2 Multicue BIPED

Benchmarks: BSDS500 NYUDv2 Multicue BIPED

Metrics: ODS OIS AC SEval CEval

Baselines: HED RCF BDCN PiDiNet EDTER UAED DexiNed AMH-Net

Builds on: decoupled diffusion model latent diffusion model RCF HED

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy